INSPEC28892

• Permit No: C1981071
• IBM Index Class Name: Inspection
• Doc Date: 10/12/1989
• Doc Name: Letter Listing Existing Violations at Time of Inspection
• From: OSM
• To: MLRD
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

•
Lnited States Department of the Interior
OFFICE OF SURFACE Af1NING
RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT
SUITE 310
6_°i SILfER AS~ENUE. S.t4'.
ALBUQUERQUE. NEl1' MEXICO 8710?
October 10. 1989
Mine Name
Mr, Michael B. Long, Coal Program Supervisor
Mined Land Reclamation Division
Department of Natural Resources
215 Cen[ennial Building
1313 Sherman Street
Denver. CO 60203
Dear Mr. Long:
iiiiiiiiiiiniiiiii
999
~~
.~_
~~ ~
~ ^
In Rcpl. Rde fo
Permit: C-81-071
Enerc~• 1 6 2/Eckmar. Parl;
,y.~ i. 4 1 9a .y.
' S ~., rt..0 ~.~ f!S Y
.~ r ~.,
:T i~4y
..., •..:
The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OS"t)
inspection report identifies violations that are considered to have
existed at the time of the previous State complete inspection but had
not been cited.
Date of Federal Inspection: 09;28/89; Date of LSCI: OS/1~/89
The determination that the State did not cite the violations is based on
one or more of the following reasons:
The condition was identified in a Stale inspection report but no
State enforcement action was taken.
Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a
structure in existence as of the last complete inspection
(sediment pond; excess spoil fill, etc.).
Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last
complete Stale inspection have not been established (diversion
ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers,
eLC.).
a Site conditions indicate that the violations noted had been in
existence at the time of, or prior to, the last complete State
inspection.
Other (give explanation).
Although the violations were abated during a joint inspection, OSM
believes that the violations were evident during the last complete
inspection.