My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC28597
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC28597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:32:02 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:17:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
CEMEX Inc.
Inspection Date
9/5/2002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1977-208 <br />INSPECTION DATE 9/05/02 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ESC <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was an inspection of the Lyons Quarry conducted by Erica Crosby of the Division of <br />Minerals and Geology. George Martin of CEMEX, Inc. was present during the inspection. <br />The purpose of the inspection was to investigate a citizen complaint regarding the Lyons <br />Quarry. The Division received the citizen complaint letter from the St. Vrain Valley <br />Community Watchdogs on August 12, 2002. The letter specifically complains about the <br />fugitive cement kiln dust ("CKD"} that was noted blowing off the property on May 14, 2002, <br />July 20, 2002 and July 26, 2002. The letter notes several instances where the sprinkler <br />system was not in operation, thus resulting in plume of CKD off the property. Photographs <br />were included with the letter. <br />The Lyons cement plant generates approximately 20,000-30,000 tons of CKD annually. The <br />CKD is made up of fined grained particulates of crushed and calcined limestone, shale, <br />gypsum and silica. It is removed from the kiln and mixed with water prior to truck <br />transport to the C-Pit. <br />Technical Revision 1 ("TR-O1") was approved by the Division on February 1, 2000 that <br />specifically addressed disposal of the CKD. The CKD is disposed in the C-Pit and is <br />required to be covered with an interim cap of 2 feet of compacted shale and clay. The <br />working disposal area will be limited to 7 surface acres at 20' lifts. Capping work would <br />normally occur on a 2 to 5 year frequency. The disposed dust is frequently sprayed with <br />water from a number of sprinklers surrounding the disposal area. <br />The Division inspected the CKD disposal site. At the time of the inspection, the <br />sprinkler System was in operation. According to George Martin, the sprinkler system is on <br />a timer that rotates on 8 sprinklers surrounding the C-Pit. A shale cap was also observed <br />on a portion of the CKD, as required by TR-01. <br />The Division spoke with Gabi Hoe£1 er o£ Boulder County Health Department regarding the CKD <br />disposal site and the issues surrounding fugitive dust. Ms. Hoefler noted that over the <br />past several years the operator has made significant progress regarding the CKD disposal. <br />According to Ms. Hoefler, the Air Permit issued to the operator makes an exemption for a <br />fugitive dust emission as a result of winds over 30 MPH. Numerous complains are received <br />at the County Health Department, but seem to fall in the 30 MPH exemption clause. <br />At this time, the operator is following the CKD disposal plan as noted in TR-O1 with the <br />layering of shale on the material and frequent spraying with sprinklers. Zt appears that <br />the citizen complaint letter is based on dust emissions when the sprinkler system was not <br />in operation. The Division of Minerals and Geology does not regulate fugitive dust <br />emissions. Such activity is generally regulated by the County Health Department and the <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment; Air Pollution Control Division. <br />The Division ensures the proper disposal of CKD in terms of groundwater protection, <br />closure for final reclamation and what needs to be incorporated into the reclamation cost <br />estimate. <br />The Division reviewed the previous DMG inspection report dated January 20, 1999. In that <br />report it states the possible necessity of bonding for the cement kiln demolition and <br />disposal. Because the CKD is regulated as a waste generated by the mining operation under <br />the DMG Permit, it would require that a bond be posted as part of the facilities which <br />would need to be demolished and decommissioned following the closure of plant operations. <br />The 1999 inspection reports states that at that time, the company believes that this area <br />of Boulder County is grandfathered as non-conforming use and that the complex and kiln are <br />allowed to remain in place after closure as part of its industrial/commercial final end <br />land use. DMG stated that it would like either written confirmation that the cement kiln <br />is allowed under the current zoning and has the approval of Boulder County to remain in <br />place after reclamation is completed, or a Certificate of Designation regarding the <br />disposal of Cement Kiln Dust. The Division further stated that if neither of these <br />measures are taken in the near future, DMG will recalculate the financial warranty for the <br />site based on the cost of decommissioning the kiln, unless such confirmation is received, <br />in which case the financial warranty will be based on the County requirements for leaving <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.