My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC28554
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC28554
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:32:01 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:16:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980149
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
11/2/2000
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• (Page 3) • <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-80-149 <br />INSPECTION DATE 11/2/2000 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS TAS <br />5. Other reclaimed alluvial lakes immediately north of the St.Vrain River and known as the <br />"Seigrist Lakes", across from the lakes owned by Mr. Roberts were inspected. Water levels <br />at the Seigrist Lakes appeared to be 12-24" down from normal. During an average <br />precipitation or a wet year, it is likely that the alluvium would recharge the St. Vrain <br />during the spring and early summer, and the St. Vrain would recharge the alluvium from mid- <br />summer throughout the winter. However, this year as well as the past several years have been <br />very dry years and it is likely that the water levels in the St. Vrain have been lower than <br />normal. A water level drop of 12-24" in the St. Vrain and in the surrounding alluvial- <br />groundwater fed lakes appears to be a natural occurance. <br />6. The Hokestra Pit No. 1, as inspected with Greg Nelson, is located immediately west of Mr. <br />Roberts' property. The Hokestra Pit No. 1 is active with current mining disturbance <br />(excavation) and dewatering in the Phase 2 area, less than 1/4 mile to the west of Mr. <br />Roberts property. Mr. Nelson indicated that dewatering in the Phase 2 area occurs twice/week <br />and alluvial groundwater is discharged to a slough of St. Vrain River. Mr. Nelson indicated <br />that Weld County has an approved NPDES Permit from the Colorado Dept. of Health as well as <br />a dewatering permit and temporary substitute supply plan from the OSE for this operation. <br />Mr. Nelson indicated that Weld County's previous mining activities at the Hokestra Pit No. <br />1, when south of the Last Chance or Rural Ditch, have consisted of pit dewatering and <br />discharge into the closest available ditch. Based on this information, it appears that the <br />operator's water management activities at the Hokestra Pit No. 1 are in compliance with the <br />approved mining & reclamation permit as well as other State requirements. Mr. Nelson also <br />explained that he does not believe that the water management activities at the Hokestra Pit <br />No. 1 are the cause of any significant or detrimental water level drop in the lakes owned by <br />Mr. Roberts. Rather, Mr. Nelson believes that the water level drop experienced by Mr. <br />Roberts is due to natural causes (drought) and not by their dewatering activities. <br />7. The question of whether Weld County would consider installing a temporary pipeline from <br />the Phase 2 area and route pit water to the private lakes owned by Mr. Roberts was discussed. <br />Mr. Nelson indicated that a written response from the OSE may be needed to ascertain whether <br />it is appropriate and necessary for pit water to be routed to Mr. Roberts lakes at this time <br />and if so, whether these activities will allow Weld County to remain in compliance with the <br />terms of their dewatering permit and any other OSE requirements. <br />8. At this time, the Division concludes that there is not sufficient evidence to verify the <br />assumptions of Mr. Roberts, ie: that Weld County's dewatering activities have adversely and <br />significantly affected the water levels in his private lakes. The Division will refer this <br />report to the Office of the State Engineer, Greeley Office for further review and <br />consideration. The Division requests that any written comments on the matter from the OSE <br />be sent to Mr. Roberts as well as the operator and the Division. The Division will consider <br />any further information as reported from either Mr. Roberts, the operator, or the OSE <br />regarding any possible offsite impacts from dewatering activities at the Hokestra Pit No. 1. <br />9. Mr. Nelson further explained that Weld County's future plans for the pit are to mine in <br />the Phase 4 Area, immediately west of Mr. Roberts property, within the next 3-5 years. <br />Perhaps then, it may be necessary and appropriate for Weld County to route pit water (during <br />dewatering) into the lakes owned by Mr. Roberts to ensure protection of his lake water <br />levels. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.