INSPEC28212 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NIgpECT1pN DAOE 8 E. 1s iD # M-20 (Page 2) INSPECTOR'S INITIALS SS$ pBSER~ I+cation ro osed Anderson Pit site, conducted in response to submittal of an apP erational inspection of the p P Road). This 1s the This was apre-op County fora 112c permit to mine and reclaim 159.76 acre . osted where the access road meets 1800 Roa lication will need to be amended to include the access n wasp fication. However, the fication sig ermitapp eration. The GPS The required `Notice of App ~ Dint to the site. Thep ortion was excluded in theoo~ She m Pe op will define as the access p it This p rades to supp location DMG wire significant uP9 roximate elevation of 4987 feet. road from this point to te~,o tracktroad andfwill req 108°01'39.420"W with an app road is barely lication maps. These existing coordinates of this access location Is 38°45'32.581 ~ ermit area that are not identified on the aPP ro erty that are mis- owerlines off the northwest corner of the site to be pC per y degtified, Several structures were noted within 200 feet o t e ower p There are severs) These structureshw IHneedns P P hone fine pedestals and overhead p Dies are located structures include p ermitboundary. lication map ditch along the north half of the east Pentirely from the aPP lication exhibits. Some overhead p wired in the various app if they are functional. a hee locationseo be added identified and so aea and addressed as req need to be added to the map ropriate exhibits as located on the m p sand +n app within the Anderson residence area that may uatel addressed on map cent property ownersana sw~~burestwill alOsofneed to be adegcces road and the discharg and adja to the permit. These owners ust off the northwest ection involving discussions of location and construction o e well as being notified as required for adjacent landowners. ro erty j ro osed ortion of the +nsp f acreage off the p P resent for the p These structures wdesign and d to bance o Mr. tNill Hutchins wasp es from the permit area. wire engineering to incorporate this additional area discharge ditch o osedps e. These structuarme ~h; ~ to the application will be necessary corner of the P P Therefore, an ear to object to this. permit area to install them. ermit boundary in the area where the Hutchins resident into the permit. Mr. Hutchins d'+d not app it and the north p ation ned 100 foot buffer between the p reed to allow Mr. Hutchins to planttrees on this buffer and irrigate e anies has ag ection included a plan to run tail water fafa eh~ ~ter~s of There is a desig United Comp the insp +ssues sap and outbuildings are located. to keep these liability and discharge, +ns ection. Once determine , as a visual screen, noise, and dust filter. Discussions during ineering design and construction details. Reclamation details an everal des+gn options for the discharge features were discussed during the into a separate discharge pipelditch than the settling p discharge permits S the permit application wilt need to be revised to include en costs will also need to be revised. ce running east from the southwest corner of the site. No such fence exists and to east a e The permit maps show a fen ro erty was laced in removed from the maps. are showing hoto wily need to be p th hdione aretthereCtTh ecorrect p n P lication that indicoaeS aho g this ditch thong The photos in the app ower p piss to be left fallow. Mr. Anderson was discing e incorrect. These photos show p the permit. round that apP of the proposed affected area con tti ss nspec on. weed, Canada na The entirety weeds across the north half of the site during little occurrence of noxious weeds. They occur mostly along the weeds noted on site thatk illThg site has deryssed in the weed control plan include Russia Noxious thistle, Russian olive and tamans perimeter and interior irrigation ditches.