Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1986-076 <br />INSPECTION DATE 8/17105 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO.HHP,KAP <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Hard Rock and Metals 110 DMO permits. The <br />operator was contacted about the inspection, and the operator, named on page one, was present during the inspection. There <br />was no mining or processing occurring at the time of the inspection, though the operator was performing routine facilities <br />maintenance. <br />The site is identified by the required permit ID posted at the entrance to the permitted area, and all boundaries are also marked <br />The mill and support facilities were inspected. There was no ore stockpiled outside the mill or left in the hopper. Fuel was <br />stored outside the mill in a tank and secondary steel containment as required. The mill building structure appeared to provide <br />the required secondary containment of mill circuit fluids. A small amount of assaying chemicals was stored in the assay lab in <br />the building. <br />The exterior tailings dewatering sump was full. The operator noted that since no recent milling had occurred, the full condition <br />was due to stormwater retention. However, since the sump still contained tailings solids that should not be allowed to flow <br />outside this sump, the operator was instructed to increase the freeboard by raising the height of the containment berm. Later <br />when the water in the tails does percolate into the ground and the sump contains only solids, the tails should be moved to their <br />disposal pond, which will re-establish the sump's capacity. <br />The exterior of the building was inspected for structural integrity, especially where slight sloughing had been previously noted <br />on the east end above the roadway. The operator has been installing grouted wire mesh and hand-placing angular boulders on <br />the steep slope from the roadway up to the foundation of the building to repair the slope and prevent future erosion. The <br />armoring was not yet finished, and the operator stated that he will continue this activity across the slope. <br />The site contains a number of processing and neutralizing chemicals that maybe allowed under the approved Environmental <br />Protection Plan (EPP), but the quantities of the chemicals are not currently documented. Drums of sodium cyanide briquets, <br />hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite were observed. Since the tally of designated and other chemicals onsite is not <br />current, this is noted as a problem, under the topic of "records" The operator must provide a list of the chemicals stored onsite <br />and their quantities. See the last page for the correction date. <br />The mining area is still in the same location, though there is a larger cut face. The crusher still stands near the mining area. <br />An old portal has been exposed low on the cuttace, but there is no underground mining. The portal and visible portion of the <br />drift appear very unstable. Most of the material moved at the mining area will be backfilled behind the excavation, to raise the <br />floor of the mining area and retain the stability of the slope, as approved in the mining plan. The operator must ensure that as <br />mining proceeds or future sloughing occurs, that the roadway above the mining area is not undercut or stability compromised. <br />If this occurs, it may become a problem. <br />There is a small amount of milling equipment stored on a lower bench, that is not planned for use onsite, and will be removed. <br />This will help maintain a low bond amount. <br />The tailings disposal pond has not received any tails this year, since milling has been limited. The outer containment berm <br />appeared stable, though the cutslope has eroded a bit. The talus rocks that have fallen into the disposal area have not <br />damaged the integrity of the containment, but have reduced the capacity. The rocks must be removed and placed in a stable <br />(or final) location, before the pond is used. One possible location is the buttressing of the steep slope west of the tails pond <br />where the old portal is being covered. Material placed against the toe of that slope will help reduce the raveling of talus and <br />shoughing of soil from above the portal. <br />Stability of slopes is and will bean issue at this site. The practice of ensuring long-term stability of the steep slopes by careful <br />placement of talus, fill, and soil in key locations was discussed. Part of the mining and reclamation plans includes placement of <br />fill in specific areas as development proceeds on the site. The operator should consider prioritizing the placement offill notjust <br />in the "planned" areas for attaining final topography in the long-term, but also in presently disturbed areas that (1) need <br />stabilizing and/or (2) are disturbed and can be reclaimed now. Included in this issue are the eroding soil and root masses, <br />which can enhance overall reclamation if salvaged and carefully placed soon after their sloughing is noticed. This is not a <br />problem at this time, since the operator appears to conitually work to stabilize the site and salvage soil, but this method could <br />improve this effort. In the long run, reclamation will be accelerated and the bond will stay lower. <br />