Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 • • <br />' October 11, 1991 <br />Inspection report <br />File no.: M-73-007 <br />Finally, because of the extensive errors in the inspection report, for <br />whatever reason they might have occurred, Transit Mix Concrete requests <br />that a new inspection report be prepared that accurately reflects the <br />conditions on the site and the permitted plan. Although this is perhaps <br />an unusual request, we want to point out that inaccurate inspection <br />reports can eventually lead to unnecessarily severe and sometimes very <br />expensive problems for an operator. We recognize that, in all <br />probability, most inspection reports contain a few errors. It is hard <br />to avoid not making some mistakes because of the complexity of most <br />permits and the limited amount of time the staff may have in reviewing <br />complex files. But an inspection report [hat contains mostly errors <br />should, we believe, be replaced with a corrected report. We do not <br />think the existing report should be destroyed otherwise questions may <br />arise in the future regarding the paper path in the record. The new <br />report should make reference to the original report and clearly state it <br />is a corrected report. <br />Thank you for your consideration of this matter. If you want to discuss <br />this further, please call. We are certainly just as interested in <br />resolving these apparent inconsistencies as you are. <br />Respectfully, <br />~~~ ~° <br />Mark A. Heffner <br />cc: Bud Herskind, President of Transit Mix Concrete <br />Bruce Humphries, MLRD Minerals Supervisor <br />