My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC26200
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC26200
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:25:41 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:04:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
3/2/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Pg 1/1 <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments in Section IV describe any enforcement actions <br />taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />North Thompson Creek C-19 1-025 <br />2 March 2005 <br />This was a complete inspection of the North Thompson Creek Mine conducted by <br />Jim Stark of CDMG. The records were checked on 15 February 2005 and the site was <br />flown by Harry Ranney on 2 March 2005 because it was inaccessible due to snow (I <br />got stuck at the upper gate attempting to get into the site on 15 February 2005). The <br />weather on 15 Feb 2005 was snowy with about 9" of snow on the ground. The <br />weather on 2 March 2005 appeared to be clear and sunny with a moderate amount <br />of snow on the ground. <br />Availability of Records: All of the necessary records were available at the Garfield <br />County Courthouse in Glenwood Springs. See the records checklist for more detailed <br />information. <br />Roads: The access road to the ponds, portal and flume area was covered with snow <br />but appeared to be stable at the time of the inspection. <br />Hydrologic Balance: -The long pond contained water at the time of the inspection. <br />The pond appeared to be functioning properly at the time of the inspection. No <br />erosional problems were noted on the pond embankment. <br />- Ponds T-1 and T-2 were covered with snow at the time of the inspection. It <br />appeared as though water was still flowing from T-t to T-2 because the area of the <br />discharge and inlet was not snow-covered. Both ponds appeared to be functioning <br />as designed. Pond T-2 was discharging, as noted by the water/lack of snow on the <br />ground by the outfall. There were no erosional problems noted on either <br />embankment. <br />- Pond P-9 was covered with snow at the time of the inspection. It was unclear if the <br />pond contained water (if it did, there was only a very small amount in the bottom). <br />There were no erosional problems noted on the embankment. <br />Backfilling and Grading: AI{ of the regraded mine areas were covered with snow. <br />The areas appeared to be stable at the time of the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.