Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />2 <br />III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the <br />inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />signs of slope instability. The area was well vegetated. The eastern edge of the mine #3 <br />portal area, where runoff from the subdrainage channel had flattened vegetation and <br />produced some erosion last year, has not gotten worse. <br />The reclaimed area above reclaimed pond P-2 showed no signs of slope instability. <br />There were no problems observed at reclaimed ponds P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, P-6, P-7 and <br />P-8 except that very little or no vegetation has taken hold on the reclaimed pond locations <br />yet. <br />There were no erosional problems at the reclaimed waste pile. Riprapped side drainage <br />channels were intact and functional. The entire pile has positive drainage and is well <br />vegetated. <br />To soil <br />There was no gullying on the topsoil pile near the treatment ponds. The topsoil stockpile <br />sign has fallen down, however, and needs to be put back up. <br />adout <br />There was no activity at the loadout. There were no signs of erosional problems. <br />ecords <br />The mine records are located in the Garfield County Courthouse. The records were in <br />compliance. <br />c:\~vp61 \ntc\insp0399 <br />2 <br />