Laserfiche WebLink
• (Page 2) • <br />MINE ID k OR PROSPECTING ID # M-91-054 <br />INSPECTION DATE 9/9/99 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of 110 metals permits. The operator was contacted <br />about the inspection but was not present during the inspection. <br />The permit area consists of two separate parcels: an upper pad at the shaft location and a lower pad at the tunnel portal <br />location. The site was not active at the time of the inspection. Two pieces of mining equipment were present at the upper <br />pad site: a Cat D8 dozer and a Leroi diesel (wheeled) compressor. No fuel appeared to be stored at the site, and there was <br />no visible soil staining from hydrocarbons. (These equipment locations appear to be the same as those in the 1994 <br />inspection photos.) <br />The shaft pad area is adjacent to the forest road which provides access to the permit area. It is a narrow pad located on <br />a steep hillside, and includes a vertical cut face about 220 ft long x 20 ft high, a waste rock pile area about 120 ft x 60 <br />ft and piled about 12 ft deep average. The shaft has apparently been closed, and the exact shaft location is not discernible. <br />The pad surface is level but fairly rough. There is no upslope diversion, but the pad appears to contain all surface runoff. <br />The road is located along the outer edge of the pad, and is bermed. <br />The road connecting the two pad areas has not been used by wheeled traffic in several years. It is littered with large rocks <br />which have rolled down from upslope, partly blocked by sloughed fine material, and is becoming vegetated on its own <br />(mainly by a species of seneciol. A game trail is the only evidence of use. <br />The lower pad area is directly downhill from the shaft pad. There was no equipment there. The only recent mining-related <br />item noted was an empty 40-gallon steel drum. (A 1994 inspection photo shows this drum was on the upper pad at that <br />time.) There was no soil staining, and no other debris (except for about 40 feet of very old steel rail). The tunnel portal <br />was nearly closed by sloughing material. There was no eMerior portal shed, but the actual portal opening was seen to be <br />timbered. The pad surface is smooth and level. A significant number of large rocks have rolled down from above onto the <br />pad. If the operation is to be reactivated, these boulders would have to be moved, but may be useful in final closure of <br />the portal. The sidecast material forming the outslope of this lower pad appears stable, but has covered the bases of <br />several large spruce trees, killing at least four of them to-date. <br />The permit area boundary was marked by at least six steel posts, which appeared to roughly conform to the mapped <br />boundaries in the file. One marker was in the center of the upper pad, possibly on the location of the closed shaft. The <br />file contains a 9/16/96 note from the operator stating that the permit ID signs were placed in the "entrance to the tunnels <br />of the old mines." It is not clear if this means that there is more than one portal, or if the shaft is the second "entrance" <br />included in this statement. There was no sign visible anywhere at the site, though the operator knows it is a required item <br />to be maintained at the site. If one or more signs were present, they were not observed. (If keeping the signs safe from <br />snowslides or vandals is a concern, and it is expected that the same equipment will be kept at the site, the signlsl could <br />possibly be affixed to the equipment itself.) The lack of a clearly visible sign is noted as a problem on gage one of this <br />report because it is required by Rule 3 1 12 If a sign was present abating this problem will be as simple as contacting <br />this inspector as to its location. If there was no sign, the operator must install one, before the site is inaccessible this year. <br />The corrective action date is shown on the last page of this report. <br />The bond for this site is 51500, and the amount has not been re-evaluated in several years. This office will examine the <br />reclamation plan, and compare it to the site conditions observed, to see if the present amount is adequate. Any increased <br />amount will be communicated to the operator. <br />There were no other problems noted or observations made during this inspection. For all questions or responses to this <br />report, please contact this inspector at the following address or phone: 484 Turner Dr., Bldg. F-101, Durango CO 81301; <br />tel 970/247-5193 or fax 970!247-5104. (Please note: this office will move to a new address in Durango, effective <br />10/1/99. The new address will be 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125. The phone numbers will not change.) <br />