INSPEC24311 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. In addition to Steven Leach, Beth Hensen, Troy Summers, Lisa Swanson, Jason Herden, Mike Miller, and Austin Facett accompanied Byron G. Walker (Walker) on portions of this inspection. ROADS Some roadside ditches have down cut below design depths (see the inspection report of June 6, 2006). No remedial work has been accomplished. HYDROLOGIC BALANCE There were no overland surface flows. There was water in check dams 7 and below of the string-of pearls. Discharges from the sedimentation ponds were mostly from seep and spring discharges. There was no discharge from the West Ridge pond. Discharge from the Center Ridge pond was estimated at 1 gallon in 10 seconds (0.01 cfs). The flume flow measurement was 0.1 foot (0.089 cfs). Dischazge from the Moffat Pond was measured at 1 cup/minute (less than 0.001 cuffs). See SLIDES AND DAMAGE below for a discussion of the West Ridge Pond. BACKFILL AND GRADING A small amount of grading is currently required at the facilities area adjacent to Oak Creek to complete the requirements of the reclamation plan. There has been no activity on this reclamation. SUPPORT FACILITIES An office building and associated pazking area in the Oak Creek facilities area still remains on site. There was no sign of change in condition. Both culverts in this area were checked. They were in good repair. TOPSOIL A small storage pile of topsoil is retained for the remaining reclamation of the of the facilities azea in the vicinity of Oak Creek. REVEGETATION Revegetated areas looked good. Some thistles were starting to appear on the upper banks of the sedimentation ponds. C-1980-001 CP Inspection 6 September 2006 page 3 of 5 pages