Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the <br />inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This aerial inspection was flown on October 30, 2000 by Harry Ranney of the Colorado Division <br />of Minerals and Geology. The digital images were reviewed on November 6, 2000 by Joe <br />Dudash of the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology. No compliance problems were <br />observed during the overflight. The loadout site was wet with ponded water in several low spots. <br />Hvdrolo~v <br />There was a little ponded water in pond no. i. The pond embankment was well grassed and <br />appeared to be stable. Pond no. 1 inslopes also appeared to be stable. The collection ditch leading <br />into pond no. 1 appeared to be functional. <br />Roads <br />The east light use road was in good shape. The east gate was closed. The main road was also in <br />good condition. <br />Facilities <br />The fuel area berm appeared to be functional. Several coal haul truck trailers were parked near <br />pond no. 1. Several rail cars were in position for loading. Some of the railcars were near the <br />county road crossing but did not appeaz to be blocking access. Coal was stockpiled in small <br />individual piles near the grizzly and in one large stockpile to the west. There were no signs of <br />fugitive dust problems at the loadout. No problems were evident at the material storage area. <br />Toasoil <br />There were no signs of erosional gullying at the east side topsoil stockpile. <br />c:\ms97\terrorUnsp 10006 <br />