Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE ~~ ~~p ~.~V-0D3 <br />~~~ ~6~uay~`~vo! ~ <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during <br />the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting fhe enforcement action. <br />This was a partial inspection of the Hayden Gulch Mine conducted by Jim Stark of <br />CDMG. The mine site is reclaimed. The weather was warm and sunny and the <br />ground was damp. <br />Signs and Markers: All of the permit boundary and mine ID signs were posted. The <br />fences around the three shrub parcels were in good condition and marked. <br />Hvdroloaic Balance: -Pond 003 contained water but was not discharging. The pond <br />was well vegetated and appeared to be in good condition. <br />- Pond HG-8 also contained water. This pond was not discharging either. The pond <br />was well vegetated and appeared to be in good condition. <br />Fish and Wildlife: No wildlife was observed at the site during this inspection. There <br />were, however, several cattle grazing just below the 1998 slump area. <br />Reveaetation/Reclamation Success: The three shrub parcels are all doing well. The <br />shrubs are all green and appear to be in good condition. The grasses in the shrub <br />parcels are also green and appear to be doing well. The slump area where the <br />underdrain was installed in 1998 is also covered with grass. <br />Slides and Damaae: The steel stakes that have been placed across the slump area <br />are all still in alignment. There appeared to have been a discharge from the <br />underdrain outlet closest to the riprapped channel below/beside the slump area (it <br />appeared as if there was recent flow on the riprap below the beginning point of the <br />drain). It was difficult to determine if there had been drainage from the other outlets <br />because of rain the previous night. <br />