My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC24269
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC24269
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:24:00 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:54:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1991086
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
5/26/2005
Doc Name
Request for Extension
From
Bent County
To
DMG
Inspection Date
3/21/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bent County Administrator's Office <br />P. O. Box 350 <br />Las Animas, Colorado 81054-0350 <br />Phone: (719)456-2223 s~..- <br />Fax: (719) 456-0375 ~#~s r;., e.` <br />e-mail: bentadminCdbentcountv.net ~` <br />!/ <br />Mr. Larry D. Oehler <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />May 24, 2005 <br />RE: Request for Extension: v <br />Verhoeff Pit No. 2: (M-1992-113) <br />Earl-Hoffman-Reyher Pit (M-1991-086) <br />Dear Mr. Oehler: <br />MAY 2 6 2~'D5 <br />Giuision of biinsrals & Ge6lopy <br />As per our phone conversation late last week we do find that we cannot <br />adequately and fu{ly address the requirements you specified as due on or before <br />June 1,.2005 without requestirig an extension of time for our response. <br />Verhoeff Pit #2: 11992-113) Although we are in the process of attempting to <br />address the infestation of tamarisk we are unable at this time to address the <br />~^ s~. questions you raised on the irregular boundary as changed by Amendment No. <br />3_~~_~ 6 7. It appears that this pit was one transferred from Carder to Bent County <br />several years ago. It would further appear to me that the amendment to which <br />you refer was probably submitted to the Division by Carder, the former operator. <br />It would be sincerely appreciated that we be furnished a copy of what you note <br />as the amended permit boundary as everything in our file in inconclusive. <br />,/ Earl-Hoffman-Reyher: (1991=0861 .Although ;we .are in .the process of <br />attempting to address fhe infestation. of tamarisk we'do have a:problem trying to <br />respond to your questions ori' fhe "long narrow permit area with a very irregular <br />i~ S ~° boundary that does not match the permit Mine Plan Ma_p". This pit was also one <br />3 -d-/ • ~ 5 which was tYansferred~from a-previous operator to Bent County. If it ever existed <br />in our file I am unable to locate the permit Mine Plan Map. It would be <br />appreciated that you also furnish to us what is in the Division's file. <br />Hopefully -once we receive the maps -we'll be able to address these boundary <br />questions. Your assistance will be greatly appreciated. <br />Yours truly; <br />BENT COUNTY AD ISTRATOR'S OFFICE <br />~IV~ Y <br />Frank Bryant <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.