Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1987-028 <br />INSPECTION DATE 09/28/04 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ESC <br />This was an inspection of the Lily Mines conducted by Erica Crosby and Carl Mount of the <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology. No representative from Colorado Marble, L.L.C. <br />was present during the inspection. However, the site was currently being mined. Aaron Tezak <br />was the operator present on site loading marble into trucks to be hauled down along Highway <br />50. The Division briefly spoke with Mr. Tezak prior to and after the inspection. It appears <br />that Arron Tezak is working as a contractor on the site, <br />The Lily Mine is located 1 3; miles north of Garfield in Chaffee County, Colorado. The site <br />is situated at an elevation of 11,000 feet. The permit was issued on March 18, 1988 for 9 <br />acres of disturbance. The site is located on private land. A condition of the permit <br />requires that mining only occur between the months of June to September. The Division <br />currently holds a financial warranty in the amount of $24,000.00.00 <br />Mining noted outside of the approved permit area <br />The Division used a Trimble GeoXT Global Positioning System {GPS) to determine the affected <br />boundary of the mining operation. The Division collected data by traversing the perimeter of <br />the affected area. In addition, the Division measured the various benches to determine the <br />vertical distance between the highwall, working face and waste pile. The following acreages <br />were noted: <br />1. The perimeter of the affected land totaled 19.96 acres. <br />2. The bench below the working area totaled 1.10 acres. <br />3. The bench above area 2 totaled 0.2 acres. <br />4. The top of the waste pile totaled 1.33 acres <br />5. The bottom hole of the pit totaled 0.11 acres <br />The data stored in the GPS unit was downloaded into the Pathfinder Office software and was <br />differentially corrected to reduce errors. The collected data indicates that the Russell <br />Gravel Pit is approximately 20 acres, roughly 11 acres over the permitted area. The GeoXT <br />has submitter level of accuracy. Please see attached map for further detail. <br />Based on data collected with the GPS, is apparent that mining operations have been conducted <br />outside of the approved affected area boundary. Therefore, there is a reason to believe that <br />a violation exists for mining outside the approved affected area or that the operator is <br />mining without a permit. <br />The possible violation and correction actions are noted as follows; <br />The operator failed to protect areas outside of the affected land from slides or damage <br />during the mining and reclamation operations in accordance with 34-32.5-116(4)(I)of the <br />Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Construction Materials, OR the operator <br />failed to first obtain a reclamation permit prior to engaging in a new operation in <br />accordance with 34-32.5-109(1) of the same Act. Notice of the said violations will be sent <br />under separate cover. <br />The operator will need to submit a 112-conversion application (112 permits are required for <br />sites greater than 9.9 acres). The application should update M-1987-028 so the total <br />affected area and all present and future disturbances that have occurred and/or will occur as <br />a result of this operation will be included in the permit area. A complete 112 Conversion <br />Application must be submitted by December 1, 2D04 and approved by March 1, 2005 (or April 1, <br />2005 if comments are received). See page 4 for additional detail. <br />Mining and reclamation not performed as approved in the permit <br />In addition to mining outside of the permit area as noted above, the operator has not <br />performed mining and reclamation as prescribed in the approved permit. In particular, the <br />application states: <br />"The pit will be the only significant disturbance. This could ultimately be mined to a depth <br />of 40 feet high." However, it was noted based on data collected in the GPS that the vertical <br />