My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC23865
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC23865
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:23:40 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:52:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977302
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
10/1/1997
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MINE ID # OR PROSPEC ING ID # M.77~,30'i <br />INSPECTION DATE ls!/~07 <br />(Page 2) • <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS /A"S <br />1. A site inspection was conducted to familiarize this inspector with the facilities at the <br />Owl Canyon Quarry. The Division is still in the process of evaluating the reclamation cost <br />to complete the reclamation plan and the adequacy of the existing financial warranty. <br />2. The operator has acquired a permit for 161.5 acres of permitted land and a maximum <br />disturbance of 105 acres. The post-mining land use is wildlife habitat. The operator has <br />posted a financial warranty of $82,500 in the form of a Corporate Surety. <br />3. The affected land boundary was not found during the inspection, as required by Rule <br />3.1.12. The Division considers this matter to be a problem and requests that the operator <br />properly identify the affected land boundary within 30 days. Although no'. required by the <br />Construction Material Rules & Regulations, the Division suggests that the operator also <br />identify the entire 161.5 permit boundary. Attached is a copy of Rule 3.1.12 pertaining to <br />signs and markers. Please see page 3 for details. <br />4. According to the most recent annual report, the operator has backfilled and graded 16.6 <br />acres to final contours and has backfilled, graded, topsoiled and seeded 12.2 acres. This <br />inspector evaluated revegetation success on the 12.2 seeded acres and confirmed that the <br />desirable species were evident; however, vegetative cover on the site ~+as dominated by <br />"weedy" annuals and fortis. I suggested to Mr. Aisner that if the weedy spe~:ies persist into <br />the third and fourth growing season following seeding, that the operator implement a weed <br />control program and reseed with desirable species. <br />5. The reclamation plan specifies that all disturbed slopes will be reduced to a grade of <br />2:1 or less. The pit will be backfilled with sandstone 'overburden, limestone waste, and <br />other inert materials. Reclaimed slopes will approximate the elevations that existed prior <br />to disturbance. All available topsoil will be salvaged for use in reclamation. According <br />to field measurements taken by Division in February, 1997 there is suff:Lcient volume of <br />sandstone overburden to backfill the pit areas to within 20 feet of the surface. (The <br />operator has estimated a total depth of excavation of 30-40 feet). There are no stockpiles <br />of salvaged topsoil; however, the operator has been successful in acquiring "beet dirt", a <br />by-product of sugar beet processing, that is being used along with sandstone overburden to <br />provide a suitable seedbed for revegetation. <br />6, Upon review of the permit file it is unclear whether structures and facilities within the <br />161.5 permit area such as the office, shop, fine grind plant, equipment storage yard, and <br />boneyard will be dismantled and completely reclaimed to wildlife as in the quarry area. The <br />Division has determined that in order to reclaim these structures and facilities to wildlife <br />habitat the operator will need to remove them, rip the surface to allieve compaction, apply <br />a cover of available topsoil and/or beet dirt, and revegetate. The Division will incorporate <br />the costs for these tasks into the reclamation cost estimate. <br />If the operator is in favor of leaving the office, shop, fine grind Flant, equipment <br />storage, and boneyard areas intact following completion of mining and not reclaiming them to <br />wildlife habitat, then one of the following options must be completed prior to completion <br />of mining at the Owl Canyon,Quarry: <br />Option A <br />Secure approval of a permit amendment to change the post-mining land use for the office, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.