Laserfiche WebLink
1\ <br />+/`' •{ • <br />(Page 3) <br />MINE ID of` OR PROSPECTING ID ~` M-77-493 <br />INSPECTION DATE 9 15 94 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />The Storks Yard Complex was visited. Extensive building and facility demolition was <br />completed this summer in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. The Reclamation <br />Permit anticipates on-site disposal of the demolition debris, however it was agreed that the <br />specifics of the debris disposal plan should be reviewed by DMG. The specifics have been <br />submitted and the review is in progress at the time that this report is being written. <br />The operator intends to relocate-the pump station for de-watering of the underground workings <br />of the Climax Mine to a higher level. This will result in flooding of a large portion of the <br />underground workings. it was agreed that specifics of this plan will be submitted for DMG <br />review, particularly in terms of the potential for surface or groundwater impacts that could <br />result from mine flooding. It was further agreed that the Division would inspect the <br />underground workings prior to flooding. This inspection has been scheduled for October 17, <br />1994. <br />A meeting took place with mine and mill pereonel to discuss the necessary components of the <br />Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) required for Climax. The EPP for thin site will largely <br />consist of identification of locations and facilities that pose the potential for off-site <br />impacts to be caused by designated chemicals, acid or toxic materials or acid mine drainage <br />(note that off-site does not necessarily refer to the permit boundary), and detailed <br />descriptions of facilities designed to contain or prevent such impacts. <br />The question arose as to the extent of geochemical testing required for existing operations <br />in order to develop their EPP. It is the Division's view, that if the operator concedes that <br />any overburden, waste rock, mill tailings, waste water treatment sludge, or other mined <br />placed, disposed or stockpiled material is an acid or toxin generator, geochemical tenting, <br />in general would not be required. The Division can envision instances when geochemical <br />evaluation would be necessary to determine if proposed reclamation measures or environmental <br />protection facilities are appropriate or adequate, but these instances can be handled on a <br />site specific or case by case basis. Mined, disturbed or exposed earthen materials that do <br />not have the containment of an environmental protection facility will have to be sampled and <br />evaluated in terms of the potential for adverse geochemistry. <br />The question arose as to the time frame for the requirement of certified designs for existing <br />operations that are Designated Mining Operations (DMO) (Rule 6.4.19(10)). It is the <br />Division's view that the requirement for certified design submittal ie not activated until <br />the EPP ie approved (see Rule 7.3.1(4)). However, the Division recommends that operators <br />collect and maintain documentation of the design and construction of any facilities that may <br />fit the definition of an Environmental Protection Facility designed or constructed during the <br />interim period between DMO designation and EPP approval. <br />The Robinson tails capping is probably the largest reclamation project underway at a <br />permitted mine site in Colorado for this year. The Division would like to commend Climax <br />personel for this and other on-going reclamation efforts. No problems were noted during this <br />inspection. <br />cc: Carl Mount, DMG <br />Dori J. Webb <br />Administrative Assistant <br />Summit County Government <br />P.O. Box 68 <br />Breckenridge, CO 80424 <br />I & E Contact Address <br /> ^ CE <br />NAME Bruce Romic ^ BL <br />OPERATOR Climax Molvbdenvm Co. ^ FS <br />STREET Climax Mine ^ HW <br />CITY/STATE/2IP Climax. CO 80429 ^ HMWMD (CH) <br /> ^ SE <br /> ^ WQCD (CH) <br /> `OTHER <br />