My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC21450
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC21450
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:21:53 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:39:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
9/27/2002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE / <br />Py/I ~~1 ~..c ~..~U-OOf <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discus i n of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during <br />the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete inspection of the Hayden Gulch Mine conducted by Jim Stark of <br />CDMG. The mine site is reclaimed. The weather was warm and overcast and the <br />ground was dry. While I was on the 1994 slump area it tried to rain (several drops fell <br />over the course of a few minutes) but there was not even enough to wet the ground. <br />Availability of Records: All of the required records were available at the Montgomery <br />Watson Harza offices in Steamboat Springs. For more details on the records see the <br />records checklist at the end of this inspection report. <br />Signs and Markers: All of the permit boundary and mine ID signs were posted. The <br />fences around the three shrub parcels were in good condition and marked. <br />Hydrologic Balance: -All of the ponds are permitted as permanent. Pond 003 <br />contained a very small amount of water but was not discharging. The pond was well <br />vegetated and appeared to be in good condition. <br />- Pond HG-8 also contained water. This pond was not discharging either. The pond <br />was well vegetated and appeared to be in good condition. <br />Fish and Wildlife: No wildlife was observed at the site during this inspection. There <br />were, however, cattle grazing on the reclaimed areas outside of the shrub parcels <br />and on the outer edge of pond HG-8. It did not appear that they had grazed on the <br />1994 slump area, though. <br />Revegetation/Reclamation Success: The three shrub parcels are all doing well. The <br />shrubs are all green and appear to be in good condition. The grasses in the shrub <br />parcels are also green and appear to be doing well. The parcel that is located <br />below the 1994 slump area appears to have the densest shrub cover followed by <br />parcel HG-08. The 1994 slump area is also covered with grass and appears to be <br />stable. <br />Slides and Damage: The steel stakes that have been placed across the 1994 slump <br />area remain in alignment. There was no water coming out of any of the five French <br />Drain pipes below the slump area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.