Laserfiche WebLink
ORIGINAL -PUBLIC FILE <br />(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: nn-I es;n_~ae <br />INSPECTION DATE: 5/19/05 INSPECTORCS INITIALS: ~~ <br />OBSERVATION <br />The Division conducted a bi monthly monitoring inspection of the site on <br />4/28/05. Te inspection began around the old Iron Clad Mill tailings area, <br />where CC&V plans to under take the reclamation of the old mill tailings <br />this summer. CC&V wanted to know if portions of these tailings are pushed <br />in the lined area of the old Iron Clad Globe Hill pads. Since these old <br />leach pads had already under gone detoxification, which included the <br />experimental BIO detoxification as, approved by DMG. DMG does not see a <br />problem in placing a portion of the mill tailings onto the lined pad area. <br />Continued the inspection to the base of the Squaw Gulch waste <br />rock/overburden storage area. As noted in the last inspection, CC&V <br />wanted to place a storm water management pond to replace the upper ponds, <br />in anticipation of the waste rock area expansion as approved in Amendment # <br />8. The 5 acre pond is going to be incised and all the calculations will be <br />based using the same parameters as approved in Amendment # 8.Top soil was <br />being removed in the area where the pond will be placed at the time of the <br />inspection. Golder and associates will certify the as built pond, once the <br />pond is constructed. Mark Tiduist, the in house engineer has calculated all <br />the inputs for the pond and will provide a copy once completed. DMG wants <br />the calculations to be submitted as an attachment to the TR that will be <br />submitted for the East Cresson area Haul Road and final configuration of <br />the backfill for the pit. Inspected the Phase I, II, II AND IV leach pad <br />area from the top of the pad along the west side, no ponded water or <br />solution on the pad was noted. <br />Inspected the Main Cresson area, it was not active at the time of <br />Inspected the phase I, II, III AND IV leach pad areas and collected the <br />following readings from the Hhigh and Low volume solution collection <br />transducers. <br />Phase I high Volume Solution Collection transducer # 2 was recorded at 30.4 <br />and # 3 was at 29.7. Low volume transducer # 1 was recorded at .09 and # 2 <br />was at .52. Piezometer for the pond was at 34.0 feet. <br />Phase II and III high Volume Solution Collection Transducer # 4 was at 37.7 <br /># 5 was at 39.3 and # 6 was at 39.4. Low volume transducer # 1 was at .14 <br />and # 2 was at.28. Piezometer for the pond was recorded at 34.4 feet. <br />Phase IV High Volume Solution Collection Transducer # 7 was recorded at <br />27.7 # 8 was at 26.4 # 9 was at 27.4 and # 10 was at 27.6.Low volume <br />solution collection transducer # 1 was at 13.3 and # 2 was 4.3 inches of <br />hydrostatic head. <br />Inspected the External pond, it was holding water. While in the area, <br />collected the following readings from the low volume solution collection <br />transducers. # 1 was recorded at 12.2 and # 2 was at 9.9 inches of <br />hydrostatic head. (All other readings are in feet of hydrostatic head <br />unless noted otherwise noted) <br />Inspected the under drain discharge area, all three ponds were still <br />holding some water. The lower surface water diversion ponds were dry. Both <br />