My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC19522
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC19522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:20:32 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:30:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
8/21/2000
Doc Name
COAL INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
8/8/2000
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />I , <br />III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the <br />inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete inspection conducted by Kent Gorham of the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology. This former, contour strip operation is bond revoked. Inspection <br />frequency is quarterly, with one complete inspection each year. Ground conditions on <br />this day were extremely dry and the weather was hot. <br />Roads <br />The inclined portion of road leading back to the south into section 22 is still in good <br />condition. Drainage control work along this portion seems to function well. Water <br />bars on the road along the contour strip reclaimed area appear to function adequately. <br />Some ponding of water occurs on the inside of the road at the last two water bars on <br />the south end. <br />Hydrologic Balance <br />All sediment ponds were dry or held a very small amount of water. Sediment ponds 15- <br />P2, 22-P5, and 22-P6 all held very small pools of water due to prevailing dry <br />conditions. The ditch directing runoff from north around the reclaimed area of former <br />pond 15-P1 was found in good condition and showed no signs of any significant <br />downcutting or erosion.. <br />Revegetation <br />The reclaimed area vegetation appeared in good condition. Vegetative cover can be <br />rated as good in most areas and shrubs are abundant, especially in the Section 22 <br />reclaimed area. Seeded species are becoming well established on the reclaimed area of <br />former sediment pond 15-P10. Few weeds exist on this area and those encountered were <br />mechanically removed. This area appears to have been heavily grazed in the recent past. <br />The reclaimed area of former sediment pond 15-P1 was inspected for evidence of <br />sprouting of the seeded species. Cockleburrs infest this area and no evidence of any <br />desirable species was noted. Revegetation efforts appear to be a total failure in this <br />area. <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.