Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1977-322 <br />INSPECTION DATE 8/29/06 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Construction Materials 110c permits. The operator <br />was contacted about the scheduled inspection. The operator's representative named on page one was present during the <br />inspection. The site was not active at the time of the inspection. <br />The site was identified by the required permit ID sign posted at the entrance to the site. Permit boundary markers were <br />observed at all boundary corners. Though mining activity is very close to some of the boundaries, all activity is inside the permit <br />boundary. <br />Evidence of the recent rains was observed on the site. Two shallow impoundments were in the pit floor, backed up there <br />mainly due to a "dike" of sandstone material crossing the floor, a remnant of recent extraction. Other than those small <br />impoundments, most runoff appears to report to a stormwater control pond at the southern end of the site. The pond contained <br />runoff water and sediment, and showed several feet of freeboard on the dam. <br />The upstream (northern) end of the site, is located at the mouth of a natural, steep gulch which extends upslope beyond the <br />permit boundary. stormwater runoff from this normally dry creek carries sediment and rocks to the mouth of the gulch, where <br />some of the load is dropped and some is diverted around the NE side of the pit along the road. The roadway is bermed to <br />prevent the runoff from entering the pit. The road is becoming severely eroded, indicating that it has been functioning <br />effectively as a stormwater conveyance structure. However, its utility as a road is now compromised, and the NW and upper W <br />portions of the permit (above the pit) are inaccessible. These aspects of the upgradient drainage and runoff patterns, the road <br />acting as diversion structure, and the roadway erosion are not problems in the context of this report, but are noted here to <br />identify a potential problem: the N and NE highwall, directly below the bermed roadway, shows evidence of a recent small <br />failure of the wall material. More of the wall may fail when the unconsolidated highwall material becomes saturated orwhen the <br />berm fails and drainage enters the pit. Either scenario will damage the roadway and its diversion function, as well as the <br />integrity of the highwall (which is vertical and 30 to 40 feet in height). More importantly, highwall or roadway failure may cause <br />slumping of the cutwall above the roadway to encroach or exceed the N/NE permit boundary. Offsite disturbance, either active <br />or passive, may be a possible violation. The operator is encouraged to remedy the drainage issues along the roadway, and to <br />buttress the N/N E highwall below the road by backfilling waste rock against the wall, to reduce the potential for offsite damage <br />and onsite instability. <br />There is a "reclamation area" high in the W part of the permit, above the ramp road. It appears stable overall, though the road <br />cut below it has raveled a bit. It is graded at about 2:1 or gentler, was topsoiled and seeded. It has minimal erosion and <br />contains well distributed revegetation (saltbush, sideoats grams, western wheatgrass, snakeweed, and globemallow). <br />There is no reclamation evident on the lower portions of the pit, more recently affected. Those areas contain slopes steeper <br />than the reclamation gradient, and are either barren or contain Russian thistle. There is also a small amount of an introduced <br />annual weed - puncturevine, which produces the obnoxious "goathead"thorns. These thorns are the seeds, and are known to <br />remain viable in the soil for up to 40 years. They are often carried to new areas by rubber tires on vehicles and equipment. It is <br />an annual weed, and may be effectively treated by herbicide in early summer before seed formation. The operator is <br />encouraged to monitor and treat these weeds to prevent a larger infestation and later difficulty in reclamation. At this time this <br />is not a problem. <br />The mining is proceeding according to the approved plan. The hill is being mined from the north end, with sandstone layers <br />comprising the waste rock generated while extracting the clay layers. The amount of clay mined is limited, and the operator's <br />time in the pit is infrequent, so it is important that the site is maintained carefully between mining events: salvage topsoil as it is <br />stripped from new areas, control weeds each year during the proper season, grade slopes to prevent erosion, reclaim areas <br />promptly when there is to be no more disturbance there. <br />The bons amount is $11,300. The bond has not been reviewed in several years, and this office must again recalculate the <br />reclamation costs. New figures will be sent to the operator for review. If a bond increase is indicated the operator must provide <br />the increase within 60 days of notification. <br />Cont. <br />