My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC17707
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC17707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:19:14 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:22:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
5/1/2002
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold
Inspection Date
4/18/2002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: M-1aRn-~aa <br />INSPECTION DATE: <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: ~- <br />The Division conducted a monitoring and construction progress inspection of the site on 4-18-02. Terry <br />MANDZIAC, Phil Barnes and Mark Tidquist of CC&V were present at the different portions of the inspection. <br />Prior to the inspection, brief discussions regarding the water balance of the leach pad facility were <br />discussed. According to Phil, Golder is still working on the calculations and also suggested that CC8:V might <br />lower the slopes of the Phase IV PSSA, for additional storage. He was informed that, as long as the changes <br />in the slopes from a steeper to a gentler slope is submitted with the appropriate diagrams with the water <br />balance calculation, the Division will not object to the change from what was approved in Amendment #8. <br />A gentler slope is always preferred, in terms of stability. Given the size AND LOCATION OF THE PSSA AREA, <br />ONE WOULD ALAWYS WLCOME, A GENTLER SLOPE. However, when the slope is changed, it also changes <br />the 80% operational elevation for the pond, meaning it will be at a lower elevation than was approved in <br />Amendment #8. We both agreed that would be the case, and will be noted as such, once the final drawing <br />and water balance calculations are submitted, to satisfy DMG'S adequacy letter for approval of TR # 40. <br />Physical inspection of the site began around PHASE IV an area, in anticipation of liner deployment, the <br />interface area along Phase I; the HDPE liner has been exposed. Golder has marked all the liner exposed and <br />damaged during the removal of ore from the area, for repair, prior to extending it to the Phase IV (A) area. <br />No major problem noted. Operator has opted not to place process solution collection pipes in the Phase IV <br />(a) area, to recover the Gold, as was approved in Amendment #8. They feel due to the steep slopes of the <br />pad in this area, the pregnant solution will not require a solution collection pipes and would be able to <br />reach the PSSA AREA THROUGH GARVITY FLOW. Since this is a recovery process, it does not matter to <br />DMG, how CC8cV recovers the Gold. DMG'S concern is the detoxification process. Since that process is a <br />performance Standard, what and how the operator chooses to do recover its Gold is of little Consequence to <br />the Division. <br />Inspected the LOB AND CRUSHER AREAS FOR PAHSE IV. The area was walked. In anticipation of LLDPE <br />deployment, to the north of the LOB, clay finer has been deployed, according to representatives present, <br />Poly Flex, PLANS TO BE ON SITE SOMETIME NEXT WEEK TO DEPLOY THE LINER. <br />The Phase IV, DIVERSION DITCH ALONG THE NORTH AND West Side WAS BEING CUT, NO PROBLEM <br />NOTED. In anticipation of spring Runoff, the operator has also placed a small detention basin North West of <br />the phase III area, where the new and old highway 67 join. No major problem noted. <br />Inspected the Phase IV, PSSA AREA, all the underground workings work in the area is completed (UG494). <br />Continued the inspection to the external pond. It was holding some water. The following readings were <br />recorded from the Low Volume Solution Collection Transducers. # 1 WAS AT 10.8 AND # 2 WAS AT 12.7 <br />(READINGS ARE IN INCHES OF HYDROSTATIC HEAD) <br />Inspected the Phase II PSSA AREA AND RECORDED THE FOLLOWING READINGS FROM THE HIGH AND LOW <br />VOLUME TRANSDUCERS. <br />HIGH VOLUME TRANSDUCER #4 WAS RECORDED AT 17.4, #S WAS AT 24.4 AND #6 WAS AT 29.6 (ALL <br />READINGS ARE IN FEET OF HYDROSTATIC HEAD) THE PIEZOMETER FOR THE SITE WAS RECORDED AT 31.8 <br />FEET. <br />LOW VOLUME TRANSDUCER #1 WAS RECORDE AT .16 AND #2 WAS AT .16 FEET OF HYDROSTATIC HEAD. <br />Inspected the underdrain area. As reported in the previous inspection report, in anticipation of spring <br />Runoff, all the BMPS in the area including the large lower pond have been mucked out. Both the 4-inch and <br />south underdrain were discharging, north underdrain appeared to be still frozen. No major problem noted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.