My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC17086
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC17086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:18:55 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:19:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990041
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/7/2004
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DMG
To
Central City Consolidated Mng
Inspection Date
7/7/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 142 <br />Hazd Roclr/Metal Mining Rule 7 <br />designation by the Office. Burden of proof to reverse the Office's <br />determination shall be on the Operator/Applicant or Applicant. <br />(2) If the Operator/Applicant appeals under Pazagraph (1), above, the <br />Office, after notice to the Operator/Applicant, shall schedule the matter for a Boazd <br />Hearing. <br />7.2.5 Existing Permit -Adequate for an Environmental Protection Plan <br />(1) If an existing permit contains the necessary elements of an <br />Environmental Protection Plan, the Office or the Boazd will deem the existing permit <br />to be adequate to comply with the Environmental Protection Plan requirement, <br />(Section 34-32-116.5(4)(a), C.R.S. 1984, as amended). <br />(2) The Office may require that the Operator provide an Environmental <br />Protection Plan, as an Exhibit sepazate from the existing Reclamation Plan and cleazly <br />mazked as the Environmental Protection Plan. New information may not be required, <br />provided the Plan complies with Subsection 6.4.19 and this .Rule 7. The <br />Environmental Protection Plan submission shall reference appropriate portions of the <br />existing permit application, but shall be clear and concise and shall adequately address <br />those issues that the Environmental Protection Plan is to address. <br />(3) If there aze no substantive changes to approved on-site activities, the <br />Office review shall be considered a Technical Revision to the Permit for the purpose <br />of processing the Operator's request. <br />7.2.6 Exemption firom Designation <br />(1) If an Operator or Applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the <br />Office or the Board, at the time of applying for a permit, or at a subsequent hearing, <br />or after notification given pursuant to Subsection'1.2.2 of this Rule, that designated <br />chemicals will not be stored or used on-site for extractive metaIlurgical processing, <br />toxic or acid-forming materials wiIl not be exposed or disturbed in quantities sufficient <br />to adversely affect human health, property or the environment; and that acid mine <br />drainage, as defined in Rule 1, will not occur as a result of mining operations, the <br />Board shall exempt such existing operations from the requirements of this Rule 7, <br />which Rule implements Section 34-32-116.5, C.R.S. 1984, as amended. <br />(2) Nothing in the Board Exemption shall exempt an Operator where site <br />conditions or circumstances change, or aze not as presented by the Operator in an <br />application or at a Board Hearing on the proposed or existing activities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.