My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC17057
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC17057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:18:54 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:19:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
12/18/2003
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE '~'~ ~ - ya ~j <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments Include discussion of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during <br />the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete inspection of the Hayden Gulch Loadout conducted by Jim <br />Stark of CDMG. This is a loadout facility only and it is currently in temporary cessation. <br />The weather was cold and clear and the ground was covered with about one foot <br />of snow. <br />All of the necessary records were available for review at the Montgomery Watson <br />Harza office in Steamboat Springs. Please see the records checklist at the end of the <br />report for more details. <br />Mine Identification signs were in place as necessary as were mine permit boundary <br />signs at the loadout, the area along US 40 and the small area across the Seneca Haul <br />Road (south of the loadout itself). <br />The truck loop pond (pond 001) appeared to contain water several feet below the <br />discharge pipe (although the water was frozen/covered with snow). The pond did <br />not appear to be (or have been) discharging. The pond embankment was covered <br />with snow but appeared to be stable. There were no erosional problems observed <br />on the pond embankment. <br />The rail loop pond (pond 002) was dry at the time of the inspection (the bottom was <br />covered with snow). The pond embankment was covered with snow but it <br />appeared to be stable. No erosional problems were observed on the pond <br />embankment. <br />The truck loop (haul road), the road around the lower coal stockpile and the loadout <br />access road to the office building were covered with snow. The access road to the <br />site is the Seneca TAHR. This road was stable and in good condition. <br />The facilities area was covered with snow but it appeared to be stable and in good <br />condition. No erosional problems were observed on the site at the time of the <br />inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.