My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC16922
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC16922
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:18:51 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:18:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
4/3/2002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the <br />inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a partial inspection conducted by Tom Kaldenbach of the Division of Minerals <br />and Geology. Scott Atwood represented the operator during the inspection. <br />Most of the snow cover has melted from the site. <br />The longwall is active in panel 13 Right underneath Fish Creek. <br />Hydrologic Balance <br />Sediment Control Ponds -Ponds were free of ice. Pond B was discharging an estimated 50 <br />gpm of clear water through its flume (outfall 003, CDPS permit CO-0027154). The flume <br />was in good shape. The water levels in Ponds C and G were a few feet below the lowest <br />holes in the standpipes of their primary spillways. The standpipe and v-notch weir of <br />pond G was in good repair. Embankments and emergency spillways of the Ponds B, C, and G <br />were in good condition. <br />Mine Pumping. Neither of the two sites (115 and 109) were being pumped. <br />Stream Sampling Procedure - In the morning on the day of the inspection I measured the <br />conductivity of stream water at seven locations outside the permit area in Trout Creek <br />and the Yampa River. The purpose of the measurements was to identify any cumulative <br />impacts of mining on Trout Creek. All the measurements were made within a two-hour <br />period in order to provide a "snapshot" of impacts occurring in the watershed at that <br />time. I measured the conductivity, temperature, and pH of each sample. I collected the <br />samples at bridges on county roads by dropping a bucket on a rope into the stream. <br />Results of Sampling - All pH values were near 8.0. Conductivity values ranged from 500 <br />to 700 mmhos/cm in Trout Creek downstream from mining. These conductivity values <br />indicate the coal mines in the Trout Creek watershed were not causing the stream's water <br />to exceed the Division's 1,000 mmhos/cm material damage suspect level for irrigation <br />water in northwest Colorado. The conductivity values of the samples are shown on the map <br />below. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.