My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC16806
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC16806
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:18:47 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
DMG MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
10/21/1994
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,; <br />• (Page 2) • <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # N-80-246 <br />INSPECTION DATE 10/21/94 - 10/24/94' INSPECTOR'S INITIALS GSC <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was a monitoring inspection conducted by Gary Curtiss on 10/22/94 through <br />10/24/94 with Mr. Dirk Van Zyl and Dave Dix of Golder Associates, representatives of the <br />operator. A poet inspection meeting was held with Mr. John Hardaway and Terry Mandziak on <br />the morning of 10/24/94. <br />On 10/22/94, water was sampled from the 24 inch perforated underdrain outlet pipe located at <br />the base of the south aide of the toe dam. The flow rate was not measured, however, was <br />estimated at 15 to 25 gallons per minute. Water was collected into one liter sampling <br />bottles which had been decontaminated and treated with preservative by Accu-labs Research, <br />Inc. pursuant to a written sampling plan. An equipment blank and a trip blank were also <br />obtained. The samples were collected for analyses of cyanide, dieeolved metals, hardness and <br />total suspended solids. The unfiltered water was slightly cloudy in appearance. The samples <br />for analysis of cyanide and dieeolved metals were filtered with a .45 micron filter in the <br />field. All sampling equipment was decontaminated before and after the samples were obtained. <br />Sample bottles were labeled and sealed with custody seals and delivered under chain of <br />custody to Accu-labs on 10/24/94. A split of the preserved samples for analysis of cyanide <br />and dieeolved metals were given to John Hardaway on 10/24/94. <br />On the morning of 10/23/94, this inspector checked in at the guard shack at approximately <br />07:40 hours, drove to the Golder trailer, and met Golder personnel preparing to drive to the <br />toe dam area. Between 07:50 and 08:00, I arrived at the western elope of the heap leach area <br />above the pregnant pond anchor trench. At that time, a dozer was observed pushing drain <br />cover fill onto the VLDPE liner on the northeastern elope. No Ames laborers or Golder QA/QC <br />personnel were observed at that placement location at that time. After the dozer made two <br />or three pushes, two personnel were observed walking to the placement location. I walked to <br />the base of the toe dam and met Dirk Van Zyl and Chuck Culig of Golder who were conducting <br />moisture-density taste on the compacted soil liner. I told Dirk that I could only see two <br />personnel at the placement area of the drain cover fill. Dirk agreed and said he would talk <br />to Ames and get the appropriate personnel up there right away. At 08:10, two additional <br />personnel were observed arriving at the placement location, which increased the total at that <br />location to four. See PV-1. <br />A former sump area measuring approximately 100 feet long and 40 feet wide is located at the <br />base of the toe dam in the pregnant pond area. Some material which had not compacted to <br />specifications had been removed from that area the previous day. Material was removed from <br />an approximately 740 square foot area to an average depth of two feet. Material was not <br />removed deeper because the underdrain was at an approximate depth of three feet. Most of the <br />soft and moist material was removed with a Bobcat 753, however, there were still some soft <br />spots remaining. Dirk said the excavated areas were backfilled with bentonite, covered with <br />soil liner material and compacted. When i arrived, on the morning of 10/23/94, the area had <br />been compacted with drum rollers and Golder was in the process of conducting the moieture- <br />density testa. The sump area looked improved from the previous day with a more uniform and <br />even surface. <br />Five taste were initially conducted at the corners and the center of the sump area. At my <br />request, four additional testa were run in or near the areas which had been softest the <br />previous day. Dirk said the optimum moisture content was approximately 128. All nine teats <br />were within plus or minus 38 of the optimum. Since this ie acceptable pursuant to the <br />specifications, the Gundle crews were told to continue covering the toe dam elope and the <br />sump area with VLDPE liner. At the end of the day, approximately the eastern half of the toe <br />dam had been covered with liner. According to Daryl Miller of Golder, the afternoon wind <br />prevented the installation of additional liner. Chuck Culig of Golder was observed <br />conducting moisture-density testa on the western half of the toe dam. <br />Berhan Reffelew had pointed out the previous day an area in the southeastern elope of the <br />leach pad where three liner folds need to be removed. The operator was already aware of this <br />situation. The folds are located about 120 feet below the pregnant pond anchor trench and <br />are approximately 75•, 37• and 20• long. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.