My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC16686
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC16686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:18:43 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:17:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992054
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
1/18/2000
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
1/10/2000
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 21 <br />MINE ID 11 OR PROSPECTING ID 1! M-92-054 <br />INSPECTION DATE 1 /10/00 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of 110 Construction Materials permits. This is a <br />"reclamation-only" permit. The operator was contacted about the inspection but was not present for it. <br />The operator od this site was found to be mining without a permit in 1992, and ordered by the Board to obtain a <br />"reclamation-only" permit. The permit application was approved in 1992, and upon submittal of an adequate bond by the <br />operator, a permit was issued in 1995. Under the provisions of the permit no mining was to occur, and reclamation <br />activities were to be commenced. Under Rule 3.1.3, the reclamation phase of an operation must be "carried to completion <br />with all reasonable diligence" and be completed within five years. <br />The site has: not changed significantly during the time since the last inspection by the Division (10/51951• There are still <br />several small stockpiles of cobbly pitrun, partially graded sideslopes, gravelly pit floor, stockpiled topsoil, and incomplete <br />revegetation. The previously noted fuel tank, steel shed and steel welded pipe are still present. <br />There is no mining-related equipment stored in the pit area, but numerous pieces of agricultural equipment and irrigation <br />materials. There are no stock feeding pens in the pit floor nor fences surrounding the site to exclude livestock. <br />The approved reclamation plan calls for slope grading, topsoil spreading, stock pens on the floor, and revegetation seeding <br />on the slopes. These activities are either only partially completed or not yet begun. Due to the length of time that has <br />passed since the permit was issued, during which reclamation has not, apparently, been carried out in a timely manner, <br />the following inspection topics are being noted as problems: <br />1. Topsoil ITSI: The topsoil has not yet been respread on reclaimed surfaces, and it has been <br />allowed to become weedy in the stockpiles. The operator must treat the weeds and apply grass seed to the topsoil, either <br />on the topsoil in the stockpile or after it has been respread. This must be carried out during the 2000 construction season. <br />2. Reclamation plan completion (RS): The reclamation plan has not been pursued diligently, and <br />the operator is now in the fifth year of the reclamation phase las calculated from the date of permit issuance, not from the <br />date of permit application approvall. The operator must commence all remaining reclamation tasks during the 2000 <br />construction season. <br />The operator was informed in 1995 that a permit ID sign and permit boundary markers were required to be installed, <br />pursuant to Rule 3.1.12. These have not, apparently, been installed or maintained at the site. Due to this condition, the <br />following is still noted as a problem: <br />3. Signs and markers ISMI: The site has no ID sign or permit boundary markers, though the <br />operator has been made aware of the need to place and maintain such. The operator must install these items by the date <br />shown on the last page of this report. <br />There was an observed infestation of a species of knapweed and of a species of thistle, both of which are included on the <br />State noxious weed list. Noxious weeds are required to be controlled. Allowing a recognized infestation to continue <br />uncontrolled will lead to spread of these species. On permitted mine sites, it causes the reclamation to become more <br />difficult and time consuming, and leads to higher reclamation bond amounts. For these reasons, the following has been <br />noted as a problem: <br />4. Revegetation IRVI: There is an infestation of noxious weeds within the permit boundaries. The <br />operator must submit an adequate weed control plan for the site, and commit to the prompt and continued treatment of <br />these weeds until they are controlled. A qualified weed control authority should be consulted in the preparation of this <br />plan. <br />For each of these listed problems, the corrective actions will include a written follow up response from the operator, which <br />must be received at this office by certain dates. Please see the last page of this report for the correction dates. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.