Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M1982-020 <br />INSPECTION DATE 6-10-2004 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS SSS <br />This was a partial inspection conducted to familiarize this inspector with this site and it's current conditions, due to the recent <br />operations to reactivate the mine and mill. Russ Means, DMG; and Mick Carter, operator for the permittee accompanied. <br />The current process of reactivating the mine includes rehabilitation of the old secondary escapeway shaft located at the <br />southwest corner of the tailings pond. The old shaft had been caved and was reopened and lined with steel tanks laid end to <br />end and welded together. Holes were cut in the ends of the tanks to allow a ladder to be installed through the steel lined <br />manway, from the workings to the surface. The original mine plan addresses creation of an escapeway in the southeast portion <br />of the original 2 acre permit area, but no details were ever submitted, and the reclamation of such was never addressed or <br />included in the reclamation cost estimate. Therefore, the operator needs to submit a technical revision to DMG addressing the <br />construction and reclamation details for the escapeway. Those details need to include revised permit maps and reclamation <br />cost fgures for the escapeway (if the escapeway is to be sealed). <br />An above ground diesel fuel tank was brought to the site and hooked up to supply the generator. This tank was located beside <br />the engine building and was not installed in a spill containment structure. The operator will need to include details of the spill <br />containment structure in the technical revision required above. The details must show the size and location of the tank and <br />give the construction specifications to show that the spill containment is adequately sized to contain all the fluid of the largest <br />tank to be stored within it. The permittee will need to ensure that this tank and all hazardous material containers stored on site <br />are located in adequate spill containment facilities. This includes drums and buckets of hazardous materials, batteries, etc. <br />The permittee is storing explosives on his property near the site for use at the mine and use in his construction business. The <br />off-site storage is acceptable due to the explosives not being used exclusively for the mining operation, The operator indicated <br />that the BATF had recently inspected and approved the explosives magazines. <br />As noted in the previous inspection report, there is a stockpile of rock that has been imported from the Brown Derby Mine. This <br />material was to have been crushed and removed before the 2003 winter, but this was not accomplished. DMG has been <br />lenient regarding the importation and stockpiling of this material without notice to DMG nor revision to the permit. This material <br />must be removed from the site, either crushed or uncrushed, by August 31, 2004. <br />The permittee has also indicated an interest in importing material from other mine sites for processing at this mill, potentially <br />becoming a custom mill. A memorandum of understanding between DMG and the Colorado Department of Public Health and <br />Environment (CDPHE) and the law both say: (A) counties decide whether a facility can become a custom mill, and (B) CDPHE <br />oversees the certificates of designation (as a custom mill). In the case of mining, where certificates of designation show the <br />ores to be ordinary ores -not uranium ores and not mine wastes being re-processed that might contain foreign chemicals -they <br />sometimes have deferred to DMG for mills that are part of aDMG-permitted operation. <br />County Custom Mill Designation is a feature of local land use regulations or zoning. It secures land use decisions in the <br />hands of the counties, and allows the county to impose local regulations on issues like noise, traffic, hours of operation, <br />aesthetics, etc. In other words: the state, through certificates of designation and reclamation permits cannot impose a <br />custom mill upon a county if the county doesn't want it. <br />Therefore, before Lucky Strike imports off-site ore, they must: <br />1. Gain county approval for a custom mill <br />2. Contact CDPHE -Solid Waste Disposal Section -Glenn Mallory -regarding the need for getting a certificate of <br />designation for the ores chosen. <br />3. If CDPHE decides to test the ore and provide a certificate of designation, they have that authority. However, they <br />cannot cause ores to be deposited onto a DMG permitted site without a proper bond Covering disposition and reclamation <br />related to disposal of the mill waste related to that designated material. <br />4. But, if CDPHE defers to DMG to regulate the waste rock under the Lucky Strike permit, then DMG will require that the <br />permit be revised to include a commitment to sample all potential ores to be imported and submit analysis results to DMG. <br />DMG will: <br />a) evaluate the ore for toxic and/or acid forming materials and determine if it must be processed and disposed of <br />within 180 days of importation <br />b) evaluate the waste so see that it is only inert rock (not toxic or acid forming material), and; <br />c) bond for reclamation of the disposal area and handling of reagents and chemicals required for the operation. <br />