My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC14415
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC14415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:15:53 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:05:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977205
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
8/5/1999
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
7/21/1999
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• (Page 2j • <br />MINE ID aK OR PROSPECTING ID ay M-77-205 <br />INSPECTION DATE 7-12-99 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS SSS <br />This was apre-operational inspection of the expansion area proposed to be added to the Tri County Gravel Pit, through <br />amendment application AM-O7. The 93.5 acre area lies entirely within the boundaries of land owned by Thomas Curry and <br />lies adjacent to the current 24.2 acre Tri County Gravel Pit. <br />The expansion site includes an area on the North Fork of the Gunnison River, but no instream mining is proposed in the <br />proposed expansion. Mining on the new area is proposed to be conducted with loaders, backhoes, and draglines loading <br />pit run onto trucks. The mining plan will create several ponds, due to the high groundwater elevation in the parcel. <br />The area proposed as the firs[ mining area is located in an area that was washed out by high water in previous years. The <br />washout occurred when a dike between the proposed expansion area and the river experienced a blowout. The dike has <br />since been repaired. The washed out area has become a gravel covered crescent that is now partially grown over with <br />vegetation. This area, as well as a few others on this proposed site have the vegetative characteristics of a wetland. The <br />operator indicated that he has hired a consultant to perform a wetland survey of the site. Some of the potential wetland <br />areas appear to have been created by agricultural irrigation. <br />Once determined, any wetland areas on the proposed site will need to be included in the site description, in the vegetation <br />and soils exhibits and addressed in the mining and reclamation pans. If wetlands are found to be present, the operator is <br />encouraged to notify the Army Corps of Engineers of this finding to determine what measures are necessary to conduct <br />mining operations in a wetland. The operator is strongly encouraged to develop a mine plan that minimizes adverse affects <br />to any wetlands that are found. Wetlands are limited and very important habitat for many wildlife species. Adverse affects <br />to these wetlands should be minimized. <br />Much of the proposed mining area is weedy pastureland that the operator has interseeded in an attempt to establish grasses <br />that drive out the weeds. It appears that progress is being made in this direction. Several of the higher ground areas of <br />the expansion area are irrigated alfalfa fields. The operator indicated that these areas would be left unaffected for as long <br />as possible, with a few of them possibly not being mined at all. <br />The first mining area, described above, has mostly exposed cobble on the surface. The banks that were created by the <br />washout are several feet high and appear to consist of mostly overburden with and soil. During the flooding, the operator <br />created several trenches around the outside of the southeast corner of the washed out area. These trenches were filled <br />with concrete to create a barrier that would stop the erosion. The erosion didn't reach these barriers at that time, so they <br />remain in place as protection from future flooding of this type. The southwest corner of this crescent does not have any <br />bank protection. The operator will need to include a bank stabilization proposal, for this area, in the amendment <br />application. <br />There are railroad tracks along the southeast boundary of the proposed expansion area. The operator has indicated a desire <br />to revise the permit boundary so it does not encroach closer to the railroad right-of-way than 200 feet so the subject of <br />stability demonstrations does not have to be addressed for this structure. There are several fences around the site. The <br />operator owns all fences within the permit boundaries, and maintains all fences around the perimeter of his property. <br />However, the operator will need to identify the owner of those fences to determine if damage waiver agreements are <br />required for them. <br />Cottonwood Creek runs through the proposed expansion area. This creek was not addressed in the application and must <br />be included in the Water Information exhibit. If the channel of this creek is to be affected in any way, the specifics of those <br />affects need to be included in the application. The water information section must also address how the irrigation program <br />and the mining program will interact. Specifically, how mining will be conducted so that irrigation does not create erosion <br />problems on the site or lead to increased off-site transport of sediment via irrigation waters. <br />The operator indicated that an effort would be made to protect the large cottonwood trees on the proposed site. This is <br />commendable. It is also recommended that patches of trees be left where possible across the site as shelter for wildlife <br />and livestock. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.