My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC14080
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC14080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:15:33 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:03:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
2/23/2001
Doc Name
COAL INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
2/13/2001
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />This was a complete inspection conducted by Jim Burnell of the CDMG on February 13 and 14, <br />2001. Weather was overcast with precipitation that turned from rain to snow right at the <br />Gunnison County line (Lone Pine access road.) The site was busy. Several trains loaded during <br />the time I was on site. <br />At the mine, panel 13A is completed and a longwall move is going on. Panel 14 has been <br />developed. It is anticipated that the move will be completed by the end of February. A good bit <br />of coal has been stockpiled. The train situation is in flux. The railroad is replacing ties over <br />several miles of track between Austin and Delta (where a derailment occurred several months <br />ago.) Consequently, the have retained a ] 0-hour window each day during which trains can <br />access the canyon. This of course creates concentrated train traffic. I noted comments from one <br />citizen about the perceived "increased train traffic," and discussed the reasons for that. The <br />railroad anticipates 2 months to complete the repair work. <br />There was a great deal of snowcover, especially up Sylvester Gulch. <br />All signage noted was correct and in place. <br />The roads on the mine site were in good condition and have been kept plowed except to more <br />remote, "end-of--the-road" places such as the Shaft 2/3 topsoil pile. <br />There was no sign of erosion or instability of the slopes up Sylvester Gulch. Pond SG-1 was <br />snow-covered and there didn't appear to be much water in the pond. <br />The "failed fill" area was also covered with a 8-10 inches of snow. There was no sign of erosion <br />or instability there. Also, the slopes above the Sylvester Gulch substation showed no signs of <br />instability or erosion. Road ditches were functioning all along. <br />The refuse pile expansion azea (RPE) was also snow-covered. Piles of development waste <br />covered about 2/3 of the surface azea. The waste was coarse, although not as coarse as it had <br />been in the fall. At the lower refuse pile (LRP) there was no sign of instability or erosion. <br />There are a couple "bald spots" nearly bare of vegetation on the east slope. The ditch around the <br />pile was cleaz and functioning. The top surface of [he LRP -one of the raze flat spots at the <br />mine site - is being utilized as a lay-down area. <br />The materials storage bench area (MSB) showed no signs of instability. The slopes above the <br />bench were snow-covered. These have been mostly covered with erosion-control netting. <br />Pond MB-3 was nearly iced over. Water level was about 3 feet below the emergency spillway. <br />Pond MB-2R was -3.5 feet below the emergency spillway. <br />Roads in the facilities area were in good condition. There was no sign of instability or erosion <br />on the slopes at the facilities area. <br />Records were checked. See the attached form. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.