My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC13988
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC13988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:15:29 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:03:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
8/13/1997
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TRAPPER NININ6 INC. <br />August 14, 1997 <br />Mr. Joseph ]. Dudash <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Minerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Trapper Mining Inc., Permit No. C-81-010 <br />Groundwater Program Changes, Technical Revision TR-75 <br />Dear Mr. Dudash: <br />RECEIVED <br />AUG 18 1997 <br />Division of Minerals 8 Neology <br />This letter responds to the TR-75 comments outlined in your letter dated July 3, 1997. Enclosed <br />please find pcnnit pages 4-2476 and 4-247c (Table 4.8-13a) which gives a revised Trapper Minc <br />groundwater monitoring schedule. <br />Trapper offers the following responses to DMG's comments: <br />Division Comment 1. <br />Na response necessary. <br />Division Comment 2. <br />Enclosed Table 4.8-13a has been revised such that GD-1(2) will be sampled. A list `C' is shown <br />under the semi-annual requirements and a list `B' under the annual requirements. Conductivity, <br />TDS and pH are proposed not to be excluded because these parameters, even though they may be <br />affected by the addition of chlorine, should still be useful in judging other parameters. <br />Division Comment 3. <br />No response necessary. <br />Division Comment 4. <br />First statement: The annual TDS only was removed because TDS has been concluded to be the <br />best constituent to plot in the annual report and asemi-annual analysis of this constituent is, <br />therefore, deemed necessary. Second Statement: Wells COY, GP-1, GP-2, GP-7, GP-8 and GP- <br />9 were mistakenly added to the semi-annual sampling list. These wells have been removed from <br />the updated Table 4.8-13a and are proposed to be sampled only on an annual basis. Enclosed is <br />an updated Table 4.8-13a. <br />P.0. Box 187 Craig, Colorado 81626 (303) 824-4401 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.