My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC13582
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC13582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:15:09 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 9:01:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
5/23/2003
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C- <br />III. Comments/Compliance <br />This was a complete inspection conducted by Jim Burnell of CDMG on Friday, May 23, <br />2003. The site was quiet and deserted. The weather was warm and sunny. <br />Hubbard Creek was running very high and muddy, with muddy water coming down from <br />upstream of the mine site. Local sources said that the weekend should be the peak runoff <br />for the area. <br />All the signage was erected and in place. The road and gate to the site was in good repair <br />and the gate was locked. <br />The road to the site was in decent condition, rutted after the muddy season with some large <br />rocks down on the road. In the area of the Blue Ribbon Mine itself, the road is in excellent <br />condition. <br />The old coal stockpile area showed no signs of erosion or instability. Vegetation was very <br />green and looked almost lush. The milkvetch has come on well and was just beginning to <br />flower, providing good cover. There is a recent stand of grasses also. <br />Pond 4 contains willows and other vegetation, and the pond was dry. The discharge <br />structures were clear and the embankments stable. <br />Pond 3 also contains trees and willows. The discharge structures were clear and there was <br />no sign of instability on the embankments. The pond was dry. <br />Pond 5 contained a small amount of muddy standing water, and the discharge structures <br />were in good repair. <br />The area around the entrance showed excellent revegetation -the best in 5 years <br />The path (road) to Pond 5 was stable with no erosion <br />The vegetation looked excellent on the lower bench and slope. A seep has formed up the <br />slope to the upper vench and there is some minor rill development below it. That good <br />growing conditions this spring has helped the areas on the south slopes to grow a very good <br />stand of grasses and fortis. <br />The seep area at the north end of the lower bench was muddy with sparse vegetation <br />The upper bench also showed good vegetation this spring, with the roses the highlight. <br />None of the underdrains were discharging. The ditch at the base of the slope was also dry. <br />There was some young tamarisk in the ditch just above Pond 5. Must be eliminated! <br />Excellent regrowth in the area between the ditch and the creek. The willows continue to <br />encroach on that area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.