Laserfiche WebLink
• (Page 2) <br />MINE ID ~` OR PROSPECTING ID ,$ M-88-081 <br />INSPECTION DATE 10/11/95 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This report details observations made and discussions held during the second of two site <br />inspections conducted during September and October of 1995. This inspection was conducted <br />in response to complaints registered by citizens living near the mine. Rocky Conner was <br />present for the inspection, representing East-West Mining Corp., Inc. <br />Several nearby residents have complained about ground vibrations related to blasting. All <br />blasts create ground vibrations. When an explosive is detonated in a borehole it creates a <br />shock wave that crushes the material around the borehole and creates many of the initial <br />cracks needed for fragmentation. Aa this wave travels outward, it becomes a seismic, or <br />vibration wave. Excessively high ground-vibration levels can damage structures, such as <br />houses. Small underground mines shoot relatively small blasts releasing insufficient energy <br />to propagate ground motions that could cause structural damage, however, this can be verified <br />rather easil.r through use of the scaled Distance Equation. The Scaled Distance Equation <br />considers the two primary controlling factors related to ground vibration created by <br />blasting: (1) the distance from a blast location to a potentially affected structure, and (2) <br />the charge-weight of explosive or blasting agent to be detonated in any 6-millisecond period. <br />The Scaled Distance Equation is an accepted method for control of blasting related ground <br />motion, and is used in the Office of Surface Mining, ''Blasting Guidance Manual", the <br />Explosive Regulations of the Colorado Division of Labor, and ie described in the Bureau of <br />Mines, "Information Circular x`8925 (1983)". The operator will be required to submit the <br />following information so that an analysis using the Scaled Distance Equation can be <br />completed: <br />1. A description of the type of explosive or blasting agent in use at the <br />site. <br />2. The type and time period of delay elements before the priming charge <br />in the detonator. A description of the delay series for a typical blast. <br />3. The charge weight in pounds of explosive or blasting agent detonated <br />per delay period. <br />4. The horizontal distance from the blasting location to the nearest <br />house. The Reclamation Permit and citizen complaints indicate that this <br />distance ie approximately 150 feet, and thin is the distance that will be <br />used in the scaled distance analyses unless a more precise measurement of <br />the distance is provided by the operator. <br />This information must be provided to the Division as soon as possible, but in any case no <br />later than the close of business on November 1, 1995. This information must be submitted in <br />writing to: <br />Allen Sorenson <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, cO 80203 <br />For purposes of meeting the November 1, 1995 deadline, the operator may relay this <br />information by phone to my voice mail at 866-4929, ext. 322. <br />Once a maximum permissible charge weight per delay has been determined for this Bite, through <br />use of the Scaled Distance Equation, the Division will require the operator to maintain a <br />blasting record. An example blasting record form ie attached to this inspection report. The <br />seismic section at the bottom of the example blasting form will probably not be applicable <br />to this site. The Division will require that the operator maintain blasting record forme for <br />each blast on file at the site, and to provide the blasting records for Division review upon <br />request. <br />Several complainants have expressed a concern with the potential for flyrock caused by <br />blasting at the Phil Sheridan Bite. The operator reported that the shaft is now at a depth <br />of 80 feet, and that the shaft ie covered at the collar at the time of blasting. As such, <br />the potential for flyrock is eliminated. If any surface blasting operations are proposed in <br />the future development of the mine site, adequate measures to prevent flyrock would be <br />