My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC12747
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC12747
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:14:28 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:57:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985031
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/31/2000
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
7/25/2000
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• (Page 2) • <br />MINE ID ~ OR PROSPECTING ID q M-1985-031 <br />INSPECTION DATE 7/25/00 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Construction Materials 112 permits. The operator <br />was contacted about the inspection but was present during the inspection. There was no activity or mine personnel at the <br />site during the inspection. The site was secured by a locked steel gate at the east entrance. <br />The permit ID sign was posted down in the pit. The permit boundary was observed to be adequately marked along the east <br />and south boundaries, which is the main area of current disturbance. The areas of reclamation, active and past mining, <br />and stockpiling all appeared to match the annual report map last submitted. The operator is proceeding according to the <br />approved plan. <br />The southeast part of the permit area is mainly reclaimed. It has been final graded, topsoiled and seeded. Some <br />wheatgrasses and other perennials are evident, and were presumably some of the species seeded there. There are, <br />however, several weed species also present in some abundance: cheat grass and squirreltail are plentiful, and there are <br />scattered Canada thistle. The file indicates that the noxious weeds are periodically treated at the site. The operator should <br />ensure that the noxious weeds are treated this fall and closely monitored in coming years, especially in areas that area <br />reclaimed and which contain stockpiled topsoil. If the weeds spread, this could become a problem topic under the <br />reclamation plan. <br />The northern area of the permit is not disturbed yet. It is still in rangeland grasses and wooded. <br />The southwest part of the permit is where the active mining has occurred recently. The excavation is preceded by stripping <br />topsoil and overburden, and stockpiling them for reclamation. The south highwall is close to the permit boundary, and <br />should not proceed farther south. Topsoil berms are along the shoulder of the north highwall also, and further mining there <br />will damage the topsoil, unless the pile is moved. There appears to be a MSHA safety berm dozed up along the west <br />highwall, created from topsoil. The operator should not use available soils in this manner, and in fact, areas should be <br />stripped of soils farther from advancing highwalls. <br />Water has been exposed in the southwest corner of the pit; there is a pond about 1 foot deep covering about 0.25 acre. <br />A drain ditch has been dug along the south highwall, down into the underlying shale, and empties the water toward the <br />east into the unmined gulch. The ditch is flowing, and no sediment transport is evident. <br />There are several piles of crushed gravel in the pit. Equipment observed includes a semi trailer for storage in the east part <br />of the pit; and 950 loader, conveyor stacker with hopper, and a small trailer-mounted generator in the west part of the pit. <br />No fuels are stored at the pit, and there is no evidence of spilled fluids in the location of the equipment. <br />Farther east, behind a product stockpile and about 50 feet from another drain ditch is an area used for storing several drums <br />of oil and tube. A surface plume of very stained soils was observed leading away from a 55itallon oil drum. The oil may <br />not have been spilled or carelessly handled by the operator, because the drum was shot full of bullet holes, which may have <br />caused it to leak. Due to the amount of contaminated soil (covering an area of about 100-150 sg ftl and its proximity to <br />a surface water conveyance, and possible oroximity to groundwater lif perched on the shale laver) the operator must clean <br />up this area soon, and either remove offsite or provide secondary containment for all fluids stored onsite. Onsite disposal <br />of these soils is possible, if dispersed over a large, dry surface area and turned occasionally. Please call this inspector to <br />discuss options. At this time, the topic of "acid or toxic material" is noted as a problem. See the last page for the <br />correction date. <br />There were other minor amounts of debris noted on the site, including tree waste, burned timbers, waste asphalt, etc. <br />These could be buried in a dry location during pit slope grading or backfilling. <br />There were no other items noted during the inspection. For all questions or responses to this report, please contact this <br />inspector at the following address or phone: 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125, Durango CO 81301; tel 970/247-5193 or <br />fax 970/247-5104. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.