My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC12639
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC12639
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:14:23 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:56:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
7/3/2003
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE ~oKOh~'e~~ C "~l-O/y <br />~s ~~f 3 T~ 1 y 2uo1 ~a~ <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations <br />made during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during <br />the inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a partial inspection of the Southfield mine conducted by Jim Stark of CDMG. <br />Jim Burnell of CDMG accompanied me on this inspection. The main focus of this <br />inspection was to look the topography as it relates to the hydrology (both surface <br />and groundwater) of the mine and surrounding areas and to evaluate the Probable <br />Hydrological Consequences and the Annual Hydrology Reports. The mine is in <br />permanent cessation and all of the initial reclamation (structural demolition, <br />backfilling and rough grading, topsoil replacement and the seeding of a cover crop) <br />has been completed. The mine has applied for and received a Phase I Bond <br />Release for structural demolition, backfilling and rough grading and drainage control <br />reestablishment. The weather was warm and sunny and the ground was dry. <br />Signs and Markers: All of the required signs (including the mine ID sign, permit <br />boundary markers, the ID sign at the refuse pile and topsoil markers) were in place. <br />The signs at the ioadout were also in place. <br />Hydrologic Balance: -Pond 4 was dry at the time of the inspection. The pond was <br />well vegetated and appeared to be stable and in good condition. There were no <br />signs of erosional problems on the pond embankment at the time of the inspection. <br />Pond 4 is aself-dewatering pond. The dewatering pipe is equipped with a trash rack <br />and antivortex device. <br />- Pond 5 was dry at the time of the inspection. The pond was well vegetated and <br />appeared to be stable and in good condition. There were no signs of erosional <br />problems on the pond embankment at the time of the inspection. Pond 5 is a self- <br />dewatering pond. The dewatering pipe is equipped with a trash rack and antivortex <br />device. <br />-The 100-year ditch around the refuse pile appeared to be stable and in good <br />condition. Water has flowed in this ditch throughout the summer (in response to <br />precipitation events) and the ditch remains in good condition. No erosional <br />problems were noted in the ditch at the time of the inspection. <br />-The roadside ditches all appeared to be well maintained and in good condition. <br />-Groundwater monitoring wells MW-8, MW-10, MW-i b, MW-23 and MW-65 were <br />visited on this inspection to see where they were located both topographically and in <br />relation to the mine facilities area and the mine workings. All of the monitoring wells <br />appeared to be in good condition at the surface. All of the well caps were on and <br />locked at the time of the inspection. <br />-Jim Burnell will use the information obtained from this inspection in his analysis of <br />both the PHC and the AHR's for the Southfield Mine. <br />The remainder of the site looked good and no problems were noted at the time of <br />the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.