My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC12333
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC12333
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:14:09 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:55:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978314
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
2/16/2005
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DMG
To
King Mountain Gravel LLC
Inspection Date
1/28/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1978-314 <br />INSPECTION DATE 01/28/05 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ESC <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was a pre-operation inspection of the King Mountain Sand & Gravel Mine (formerly knows <br />as Hewes Pit), Permit No. M-1978-314, Conducted by Erica Crosby of the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals & Geology. Paul Banks and Don Friess of Banks and Gesso and Mike Jones of King <br />Mountain Gravel, LLS were present during the inspection. Approximately 1.5' to 3' of snow <br />cover was present on site. <br />King Mountain Gravel LLC filed a 112 Conversion Construction Materials Application with the <br />Division on November 23, 2004. The Division's recommendation due date is set for February 21, <br />2005. To date, no written objections to the application have been filed with the Division. <br />The mine site is located approximately 7 miles southwest of Toponas in Routt County, <br />Colorado. The applicant proposes to convert the 9.9-acre 110 permit to a 341-acre 112 <br />permit. The proposed postmining land use remains as rangeland habitat. <br />The expansion area is located north and northwest of the original permit area. King Mountain <br />will add 331 acres to the permit boundary, and 184 acres will be mined. Mining will be <br />conducted in 4 phases. The pit will be dry mined and topsoil will be stripped prior to <br />mining in each phase. Topsoil piles will be located on the west side of the permit area. The <br />area will be reclaimed to rangeland use and slopes will be reclaimed to 3h:ly or less. The <br />applicant proposes to replace 4" of topsoil. <br />Permanent man made structures noted on the expansion area include fences within the permit <br />area. Other structures in the vicinity include County Road 3, County Road 5, underground <br />telephone lines, underground utility lines and houses on the property. The applicant has <br />committed to maintaining a 200-foot off set distance from the County Roads until structure <br />agreements have been submitted and approved by the Division. The remaining agreements have <br />been included in the Conversion Application. <br />The Division noted a very large area of mining related equipment, debris and waste located <br />immediately southeast of the mining .area. This area will be included in the 112 Conversion <br />Application. Unless the items are removed from the area, the Division will be required to <br />bond for their removal and disposal. In addition, the Division observed several 55-gallon <br />drums of oil waste and other potentially hazardous materials. The barrels were not contained <br />and due to the snow cover it was difficult to determine if there were spills or leakage. The <br />applicant will be required to properly describe, locate and contain the fuel drums in such a <br />manner to prevent spills or leaks. As an alternative, the applicant may properly remove and <br />dispose of the materials from the site. Proof of compliance must be submitted in the form of <br />photographs or receipts within 60-days of issuance of the Conversion Application. <br />The applicant proposes to stay 5 feet above the seasonal high ground water elevation. The <br />applicant has installed 5 monitoring wells to determine the depth of groundwater. It was <br />noted that groundwater elevations do not correlate with the contour intervals provided on the <br />mining and reclamation plan maps. The following inconsistencies were noted; <br />Well Number Contour Interval <br />of well (feet) Recorded GPS <br />level of well <br />(feet) Difference (f t) <br />MWl 8656 8620.7 35.3 <br />MW2 8556 8512.7 43.3 <br />MW3 8600 8565.5 34.5 <br />MW4 8546 8500.5 45.5 <br />MW5 8550 8533.4 16.6 <br />There appears to be a difference in groundwater monitoring elevation points ranging from 16.6 <br />feet to 45.5 feet. Because the depth of the mining operation heavily depends on the depth of <br />groundwater, it is necessary that the applicant clarify these discrepancies. Once the <br />elevation of the monitoring wells can be determined, then the depth of mining can be <br />established for the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.