My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC12276
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC12276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:14:06 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:55:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1996049
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
6/24/1997
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' • (Page 2) • <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-96-049 <br />INSPECTION DATE 6/24/97 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />Site Observations by area: <br />Mining Cell #1: <br />Overburden has been stripped from most of mining cell #1 and is stockpiled along the west <br />edge of the cell, outside the "limit of mining." The overburden stockpile area is not <br />depicted on the mining plan map. Overburden and topsoil stockpile locations, whether the <br />stockpiles are short-term or long-term, fit the definition of affected land found in Rule <br />1.1(3) of the Construction Materials Rules and Regulations of the Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board. Rule 6.4.3 requires that all areas of affected land be portrayed on the mining plan <br />map. Anew mining plan map needs to be submitted as a technical revision to the permit. All <br />overburden and topsoil stockpile locations that will be outside of approved mining cell <br />boundaries need to be depicted on the new map. See problem PB-1 on the last page of this <br />report. <br />The road that is shown on the mining plan map west of cell #1 will likely not be constructed. <br />The limit of mining for mining cell #1 has been accurately staked on the ground. <br />The pit in mining cell #1 is currently being mined wet using a dragline. The pit run is <br />being used to plate and bring the plant and shop area up to grade. Processing facilities <br />have not yet been set-up at the Maryland Creek Ranch. <br />Plant and shop area: <br />Topsoil has been stripped and stockpiled at several locations. This topsoil will be spread <br />to a 12 inch depth on plant site perimeter berms. <br />Process plant perimeter berms are being constructed from overburden dezived from preparation <br />of the plant site. Excess overburden is being hauled to the Love Pit (Permit No. M-82-164) <br />that is located directly across Highway 9. This material will be used for reclamation <br />sloping and grading at the Love Pit. <br />Storm water detention ponds located north and south of the Maryland Creek Ranch access point <br />are under construction. <br />General Site Observations: <br />The west permit boundary has been fenced. <br />The required Mined Land Reclamation Board entrance sign was posted at the access road. <br />Wetland construction is underway north and east of mining cell #1. Existing wetlands and <br />areas designated for wetland construction have been staked on the ground. The wetland <br />project is being conducted under a section 904 permit issued by the Department of the Army. <br />Disturbed areas at the Maryland Creek Ranch have been surrounded by silt fence. Silt fence <br />is installed in shallow trenches, but the bottom of the silt fence has not been keyed-into <br />the trenches and buried. The silt fence will have to be keyed-in. See PB-2 on the last page <br />of this report. Silt fence installation instructions have been sent to the operator <br />separately. <br />Excess topsoil, i.e. that topsoil in excess of the amount need to reclaim the site in <br />accordance with approved permit terms, is being stockpiled outside the mining permit area and <br />will be used on the 800 acre Maryland Creek Ranch owned by L.G. Everist. Exportation of <br />topsoil from the site was approved in the original permitting process. Topsoil exportation <br />was approved because with the large acreage of ponds to be created at the site, there will <br />be a topsoil surplus. L.G. Everist contacted the Division in May of 1997, and received <br />acknowledgment that stockpiling excess topsoil outside the permit area for use elsewhere on <br />the ranch is acceptable. The excess topsoil is stockpiled on a hill behind (northwest) of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.