Laserfiche WebLink
' . ~ • ( Page 2 ) <br />MINE ID #` OR PROSPECTING ID #` H-94-117 <br />INSPECTION DATE 9/25/95 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />Pre eeant for this inspection were Hark Steen, who owns land within a portion of the permit <br />area ae well as adjacent land, and Bob Mason, a resident of Gold Hill, and a representative <br />of the Committee on Mining and Environment within Gold Hill Town Meeting, Inc. <br />The primary purpose of this inspection was to investigate concerns raised by Bob Mason during <br />a phone conversation on September 14, 1995 that ie documented in a memo to the file dated <br />September 14, 1995 and in a letter from Mr. Mason dated September 15, 1995. A corrective <br />action specified in the 8/26/95 inspection report filed by the Division requires the operator <br />to pump water from behind the Hazel-A bulkhead up to the tailing impoundment. The purpose <br />of ttiie exercise ie to dispose of process water via evaporation. The water storage facility <br />behind the Hazel-A bulkhead should only be used for auxiliary storm water storage, and except <br />for brief periods of time following significant storms or snow melt, must be maintained in <br />an essentially dry condition. Water was being pumped from the Hazel-A to the tailing pond <br />at the time of this inspection. The south end of the pond was filled with water to a level <br />approximately 2 inches below the top of the south decant riser. It was discussed that if <br />this pool of water does not evaporate significantly within two weeks, that a spray system <br />would have to be installed to enhance evaporation. It ie reiterated that when the mill ie <br />inactive, evaporation ie the only permissible method available to the operator to dispose of <br />protease water. Any rainwater, enowmelt, or seepage water that enters the tailing pond or the <br />Hazel-A adit is process water. It ie imperative that this water be properly managed to <br />maxirnize evaporation in order to maintain sufficient storage capacity during the period that <br />the mill is inactive. <br />The water level behind the Hazel-A bulkhead was observed to be no more than few inches above <br />the :level of the slimes on the mill of the ad it. With the bulkheaded water at this low <br />level, no leaks through the bulkhead were visible. No water was discharging from the Hazel-A <br />ad it to Caeh Gulch at the time of this inspection. <br />With both valves in the decant line below the tailing dam opened, the cut-out valve in the <br />decant line was opened. No water discharged from the cut-out valve, indicating that the <br />decant piping ie intact. <br />Based on observations made during this inspection, the Division has determined that the <br />requi_remente detailed in PB ,#6 of the 8/26/95 inspection report are currently being met by <br />the operator. <br />Progress on the other corrective actions specified in the 8/26/95 inspection report was <br />chectced. The operator has armored the outlet of the sediment pond below and between the <br />tailing pond and mill building by placing rounded gravel into the outlet. This will achieve <br />the desired affect, but will probably have to be checked and maintained after significant <br />storm events. Ric Fanyo reported that 4 or 5 tandem axle dump truck loads of junk had been <br />hauled off the site since the time of the 8/26/95 inspection. There was a truck loaded with <br />junk on-site at the time of this inspection. The storm water diversion ditches above the <br />tailing pond were in the process of being deepened at the time of this inspection. <br />