My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC12177
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC12177
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:14:01 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:54:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
7/15/2004
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DMG
To
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold
Inspection Date
7/15/2004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORIGINAL -PUBLIC FILE <br />(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID #: nn-Iegn-gee <br />INSPECTION DATE: Z/I S/~d INSPECTORS INITIALS: -6lL <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The Division conducted a weekly construction progress of the Phase IVC <br />leach and area and a monitoring inspection of the site on 7/15/04. <br />Inspected the Phase IVC leach pad area. The area had received a lot of rain <br />the after noon of 7/14/04, which made the clay and geomembrane deployment <br />difficult, still approximately 200,000 square feet of liner was deployed, <br />since the last inspection. The deployed liner was inspected and appeared to <br />meet the required specifications. The rainfall from the day before had <br />washed some of the Darin cover on top of uncertified liner, Ames laborers <br />under the supervision of GOLDER QA/QC personnel, were removing the Drain <br />cover utilizing hand shovels. <br />Drain cover was being deployed along the NORTH WEST facing slopes at the <br />time of the inspection. The weekly construction report from last week, also <br />reported an incident of liner tear during the deployment process, due to <br />operator error. The repair was properly repaired and tested in accordance <br />with the approved specifications. Golder QA/QC in addition to Ames workers <br />were present over looking the deployment. <br />Inspected the phase I, II, III AND IV leach pad pregnant POND areas and <br />recorded the following readings from the High and Low volume solution <br />collection transducers. <br />Phase I High Volume solution collection transducer # 1 was recorded at 24.7 <br />#2 was at 20.6 and # 3 was at 19.6. Low volume transducer # 1 was at .15 <br />and # 2 was at .52. Piezometer for the pond was at 34 feet. <br />Phase II and III High Volume solution collection transducer # 4 was <br />recorded at 35.1 # 5 was recorded at 37.3 and # 6 was recorded at 36.2. Low <br />volume transducer # 1 was at .11 and # 2 was at .40. Piezometer for the <br />pond was at 37.8 feet. <br />Phase IV High Volume solution collection transducer #7 was recorded at 18.3 <br /># 8 was at 17.3 # 9 was at 18.2 and # 10 was at 18.2. Low volume transducer <br /># 1 was at 5.6 and # 2 was at 6.3 inches of hydrostatic head. (All other <br />readings are in feet of hydrostatic head) <br />Inspected the external pond, it was holding some water (rain). While in the <br />are recorded the following readings from the Low Volume collection <br />transducers. Transducer # 1 was at 12.3 and # 2 was at # 9.4. <br />Inspected the under- drain area, all the ponds with the exception of the <br />upper most pond, were dry. Both the south and 4-inch pipes were discharging <br />at the time of the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.