Laserfiche WebLink
. . x <br />~. <br />(Page 2) <br />NINE ID ~ OR PROSPECTING ID f M-60-246 <br />INSPECTION DATE 11-4-94 ~ INSPECTOR'S INITIALS ACS <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />A monitoring inspection of the Phase 1 heap leach pad was conducted. <br />The earthworks contractor was compacting and smoothing soil liner in the north central <br />portion of the pad, above the lower anchor trench. The temperature of the soil liner fill <br />was measured in two locations. The temperature of the soil liner was 45°F with the 6" <br />temperature probe penetrating vertically, and 47°F with the temperature probe penetrating at <br />an angle in an attempt to measure the temperature in the upper 2 inchee of fill. <br />At the request of the Division, the contractor bladed up an area of compacted soil liner near <br />the upper anchor trench eo that thickness of the fill could be observed. The Boil liner <br />thickness at this location was found to be in excess of the 12" required minimum. Later in <br />the day, the CQA monitor noticed an area where the soil liner appeared to be thin. This area <br />was ripped with a motor grader, and the area of deficient thickness was defined. Additional <br />soil liner was brought in to achieve the required minimum thickness. <br />The CQA monitor was observed conducting nuclear density testing of the soil liner fill. <br />There were no failing tests in the area compacted this day. <br />The geomembrane contractor was able to deploy several panels of smooth VLDPE during the <br />afternoon. Deployment, seaming, and pressure testing of welds was observed. No problems <br />were noted. The earthworks contractor rune a smooth drum compactor over the soil liner just <br />prior to rolling out the geomembrane in an effort to smooth out any ruts in the soil liner <br />caused by the wheel loader transporting the VLDPE rolls. It ie important that geomembrane <br />only be deployed onto a smooth, even surface. <br />Other earthworks that were observed to be ongoing this date were: 1) Excavation of the north <br />side upland diversion ditch; 2) Excavation of hill no. 1 to grade; 3) Smooth drum compaction <br />on the leak collection fill (this operation is required in the specifications - not to <br />provide compaction, but rather to provide a smooth, un-yielding bearing surface for the upper <br />geomembrane); 4) Final grading of drain cover on the south side of the pad; 5) Grading of the <br />large topsoil stockpile south and east of the process plant - this is in preparation for a <br />stabilization seeding this year. <br />The leak collection riser pipe alignment was inspected. Leak collection fill had been placed <br />in a continuous lift through the alignment, a trench had then been excavated in the fill to <br />expose the alignment. No damage to the geotextile or geomembrane was observed to have <br />occurred during excavation of the alignment trench (the lowest several inchee of the trench <br />had been dug by hand). The excavation of this trench provided the opportunity to observe a <br />cross-section of leak collection fill that had been placed. No over-size material was <br />observed in the cross-section, however, in several reaches of the exposed cross-section the <br />minimum required 3' thickness had not been achieved. The operator was directed to bring in <br />additional leak collection fill to achieve the required minimum thickness. This can be done <br />at the time that the leak collection riser pipes are covered. See PB 1 on the final page of <br />this report. <br />The leach pad liner tie-in to the process plant was inspected. VLDPE installation in this <br />area has been completed; the extrusion weld to the building foundation was inspected and <br />found to be adequate, but the VLDPE lapping up onto the building foundation must be covered <br />with carefully placed and compacted back-fill. The composite liner had been covered with <br />drain cover fill prior to completion, by backfilling, of the anchor trench. Drain cover fill <br />had been pushed into, and in places had buried the anchor trench. When this was discussed <br />with resident CQA engineer Terry Mandzia k, he stated that this situation had been noted by <br />one of the CQA monitors in their daily report. Terry provided a copy of that daily which is <br />attached to the file copy of this inspection report. The drain cover material will have to <br />be carefully removed from the anchor trench, and the trench backfilled with compacted soil <br />liner fill. See PB 2 on the final page of this report. <br />