My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC11777
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC11777
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:13:44 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:52:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980002
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
INSPECTION REPORT
From
MLR
To
SYLVIA MCCORMICK
Inspection Date
6/1/1983
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_. <br />III. Comments - Compliance <br />Below are particular issues with regard to any of the above complianc~a items. Enforcement <br />actions resulting From failure to comply with the Act, Rules and Regu.(ations, and the permit <br />also are identified below. <br />Availability of Records <br />Records were not available at the mine office. Apparently, the majority of the permit <br />documents are located at the office in Gunnison. The operator was informed that these <br />documents, specifically the permit approval document, the Federal lease, the SCS reclama- <br />tion plan, the water monitoring analysis data, the NPDES permit and the engineering <br />certification for the sediment pond, should be available at the mine site. The operator <br />indicated that these documents were in the process of being moved to the mine office. <br />Signs and Plarkers <br />The permit area is fenced, but not signed. The operator indicated that permit <br />boundary signs would be erected. <br />Hydrologic Balance <br />The berm below the coal loadout is breached at a low spot near the center of the berm. <br />Because of the small drainage area, little damage was observed on tF~e slope below the berm, <br />but this breach must be repaired. <br />Mr. McCormick stated that he was planning to fill the low spot in front of the wash- <br />out and repair the berm that day. <br />A N.O.V. was not written for this problem for the following re<~sons: <br />1. The drainage area of the watershed passing through the bre+jched area was small, <br />perhaps a few thousand square feet, and no water was observed flowing through at <br />the time of the inspection. <br />2. Damage to the land surface below the breach consisted of a gully less than one foot <br />deep and extending approximately 15 or 20 feet across the surface, The mine was in <br />operation prior to the implementation of the Colorado permit system. Drainage was <br />probably occurring across the area below the loadout prior to the construction of the <br />berm. and sediment pond. Therefore, there is some question as to how recently the observed <br />gully was formed. <br />3. The area downslope from the breach extends about 200 feet downhill. At that point, <br />any surface flow is collected in an interceptor ditch and diverted into a sediment <br />pond. Therefore, no off-site drainage occurs as a result of the breach. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.