My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC11710
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC11710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:13:41 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:52:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978091UG
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
11/28/2005
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DMG
To
LKA International Inc.
Inspection Date
10/18/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1978-091 UG <br />INSPECTION DATE 10/18/05 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO, HHP <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Hard Rock and Metals 110d permits. The operator <br />was contacted about the inspection, but was not present during the inspection. The site was inactive at the time of the <br />inspection. There were about seven sacks of ore stored in their usual location at Vickers Ranch; they were not tarped. The 3 <br />Level dump areas were not inspected. <br />The 6 Level appeared to have been actively operated just prior to this inspection, and that it was not secured for leaving it <br />during the winter: a pile of uncrushed ore was located at the east end of the pad, very close to the drainageway of the gulch. <br />The pile was not tarped, though the approved operating plan requires that all ore piles be tarped against the weather. During <br />the inspection, it began to rain. Storing ore without a protective tarp allows precipitation to contact the ore, increasing the <br />follow this requirement. See the last page of this report for the correction date. <br />The operator is reminded to not allow ore or other mineralized material to slough into the drainageway. <br />There were numerous vessels of hydrocarbons (diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluid, oil, etc.) stored at the site, without the <br />required impermeable secondary containment. Most of the containers in question only held a few gallons, but they were <br />numerous and scattered around the outside of the office and storage sheds. Some were open and/or exhibited spilled fluids. <br />There were several of these inside the storage shed on a wood floor but out of the weather, and these too should be properly <br />stored. There were over a dozen vessels, containing a combined total of 100 gallons or less of various fluids. Outside the <br />office were two lead/acid batteries which had leaked onto the ground. Due to the lack of proper secondary containment and <br />the evidence of spillage, this is noted as a problem under the topic of "acid or toxic materials." The correction to this problem <br />reouires that the operator provide adequate secondary containment of all hvdrocarbons (and extra batteries) that are to be <br />There were several pieces of mining and processing equipment onsite. The pad surface appeared to direct surface runoff <br />toward the sump that is east of the portal. The portal door was locked against unauthorized entry. <br />The borrow area at the west end of the pad still has anear-vertical cut wall. The northern (uphill) permit boundary was clearly <br />marked by the onsite operator in 2004. The top of the cut wall is within a few feet of the northern boundary line, with nothing to <br />suggest that sloughing of the loose material will not continue farther up the hill. If sloughing continues, and damage occurs to <br />land outside the permit boundary, it may be a possible violation. The operator is encouraged to explore options to prevent such <br />possible vilation from occurring: either commence backfilling to buttress and stabilize this cut wall, or amend the permit to add <br />sufficient land as a buffer uphill from the present boundary, or other adequate alternative that the operator may propose. Due <br />reasonable rememdv to this problem. See the last oage of this report for the correction date. <br />This office is required to periodically recalculate the reclamation costs, based on the existing reclamation plan and the present <br />condition of the site. The operator may influence the bond figures by performing the necessary ongoing site maintenance <br />and/or limited amounts of reclamation to areas of the site that will not be additionally disturbed (such as clean-up of the 3 Level <br />dump areas, or revegetation of the 6 Level dump outslope) and informing this office of completion of such work. <br />No further items were observed during the inspection. Responses to this inspection report should be directed to the Division of <br />Minerals and Geology, 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125, Durango, Colorado 81301, Attn: Bob Oswald; phone no. 970-247-5193. <br />Cont. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.