Laserfiche WebLink
..n5. <br />n :~i <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made ~;,• <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the <br />inspection and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was an aerial inspection flown by Harry Ranney of the Division on 10/23/97. One low <br />angle oblique photo covering the entire reclaimed area was viewed by Dan Mathews of DMG on <br />] 1/4/97. There appeared to be a small pool of water in the sediment pond. It was evident that <br />construction of the lower segment of the permanent diversion channel into the pond, and <br />backfilling of the segment that had previously bypassed the pond had recently been completed. <br />At a number of locations along the permanent channel, cuts had been made in the berm along the <br />channel with associated short ditch segments to direct flow loom terrace ditches and reclaimed <br />slopes into the permanent diversion channel. These drainage modifications were to conform with <br />permanent, post reclamation drainage configuration for the reclaimed site. <br />Site conditions appeared to be dry, and there were no slwnp features or gullies evidient on the <br />reclaimed slopes. <br />- - _.r <br />