My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC11676
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC11676
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:13:40 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:52:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
8/24/2007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> <br />III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br />during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br />and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This was a complete quarterly inspection of the reclaimed Fruita mine permit revocation site, <br />conducted by Dan Mathews of the DBMS Grand Junction Field Office. Weather was clear and warm. <br />Surface soils were dry. The sediment pond contained no water; pond bottom was dry. Site conditions <br />were essentially unchanged from those described in the May 2007 inspection, with the exception of <br />seasonal changes (e.g. late summer vegetative conditions rather than spring conditions). <br />Signs and Markers <br />The DMG revoked permit I.D. sign is still present on the old gate at the site entrance. The condition is <br />unchanged from previous inspections; damaged by bullet holes but Division phone number remains <br />legible. <br />There was a new "Private Property" sign on the gate next to the DMG sign, in addition to the "No <br />Trespassing" sign at the lower end of the property. <br />Hvdroloaic Balance <br />Sediment pond and associated spillway structure were as described in the November 9, 2006 <br />inspection report. A remedial work plan that would utilize remaining bond money ($2794.00), plus an <br />additional $15,000.00 recently made available for the site from the pool of OSM civil penalty monies is <br />being developed. <br />Erosional features at the site have not changed appreciably in recent months; they remain as <br />described in the November 2006 through May 2007 inspection reports. Erosional features that may <br />warrant remedial measures to ensure that reclaimed slopes and drainage channels are not <br />compromised include gully headcut and incision immediately downstream of the toe of the riprap on <br />the permanent channel on the steep Mine 1 bench outslope, gully headcut and incision on the Mine 1 <br />portal backfill slope and along upper segment of the permanent channel on the relatively flat top of the <br />Mine 1 bench, a location where riprap was dislodged from the permanent channel near the center <br />section of the steep riprap segment, and rill erosion along the lower-most segment of the reclaimed <br />access roadbed. A remedial work plan that would utilize remaining bond money as described above <br />is being developed. <br />Revegetation <br />There is good establishment of perennial shrubs on most revegetated areas, although density is <br />relatively sparse on the upper half of the steep #1 bench outslope. Seedlings of 4 wing saltbush and <br />rabbitbrush were evident in various locations, and it appears that shrubs are expanding from areas of <br />good initial establishment into the fringe areas and harsher sites where initial establishment was poor. <br />In most areas, multiple age classes of the dominant shrub species are present. Perennial vegetation <br />is particularly diverse along the reclaimed access road, with good representation of grasses including <br />Indian ricegrass and western wheatgrass, as well as shadscale, four-wing saltbush, and rubber <br />rabbitbrush. Perennial grasses are not as prevalent in other areas, and winter annual (orbs and <br />grasses provide significant cover under the shrub canopy over much of the site. At the time of this <br />inspection, the winter annuals have long since completed their life cycle, died and dried out. Due to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.