Laserfiche WebLink
. ~ <br />Y .. • • <br />Mr. Thomas E. Brubaker -2- September I5, 1982 <br />In a1Z other regards, I feel that your annual report of~February 5, 1982 has <br />brought the status of this operation up to date. Your idea of reducing the <br />size of the maps for annual reports to make them more manageable is, in my <br />opinion, a good one. <br />Wiley Pit <br />Your annual report for this operation speaks to my inspection report of <br />November I1, 1982 (copy enclosed) with the exception of recommendation no. 3. <br />Rgain, I feel that the existing bond on this site is too Zow, especially <br />considering the intensity of the disturbance and the depth of the pit. Grading <br />costs to reduce the slopes would be very high here. The costs for respreading <br />overburden/topsoil would also be high. Please submit new reclamation cost <br />calculations for either the existing or the maximum planned disturbance. I <br />will plan to schedule this bond revision for the November 17-18, 1982 Board <br />meeting, as well. <br />Please feel free to call me if you have any questions about this letter. I <br />will expect to hear from you in the near future. <br />Sincerely, <br />/~~ /7 -~ <br />~' /1V~.7L/•L ~ I.-o'7~i <br />~ ~f <br />filar}: S. Loye <br />Senior Reclamation Specialist <br />h15L c ys <br />Enclosures <br />