Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />May 12, 2005 <br />Glen Williams <br />Cotter Corporation/ <br />P.O. Box 700 <br />Nucla, CO 81424 <br />Re: Inspection reports for M-1977-306, M-1977-31, M-1978-116 and M-1984-014. <br />Dear Mr. Williams: <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECIAMgT10N•M INING <br />EAFETY•SCIENCE <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />On May 4th, 200 he Division of Minerals and Geology inspected the JD-6, JD-8, JD-9, and <br />SM-18 Mines. Senior Environmental Protection Specialist and North Team Supervisor Carl <br />Mount accompanied Environmental Protection Specialists II Steve Shuey and Russ Means. The <br />inspection of the sites first hand by Mr. Mount is part of the review process to bring the mines up <br />to current standards and determine whether Designated Mining Operation status is warranted at <br />any of the sites. <br />The sites were inspected in mid March and no problems were noted in part because they were <br />cursory in nature, fact finding and as noted, the issues were to be addressed as part of the <br />above referenced review. However, the enclosed inspections and one for the SM-18 by <br />Specialist Steve Shuey note several problems that must be addressed immediately due to the <br />impact to the area and the pace of Cotter's production. <br />The Grand Junction Field staff has worked with Cotter on an amicable basis for some time <br />based on the fact the mines in question were mothballed and being reclaimed. Conditions at <br />the sites over the last 45 days have deteriorated to the point that DMG staff must take a harder <br />line to ensure that future reclamation can be accomplished and the overall environment are not <br />impacted anymore than necessary by Cotter activities. <br />What is distressing to this Office is that most of the issues noted are housekeeping in nature, <br />common sense planning or items that have been clearly outlined in an amendment that appear <br />to have been openly ignored. The original permits may be from the 70's and early 80's but the <br />Division must ensure that all operators do everything in their power to successfully reclaim the <br />lands disturbed. This includes saving as much topsoil as possible, preventing contamination of <br />soils and water and preventing impacts from stormwater run off. By Rule, the Division can and <br />will require Cotter to meet current standards not 1977 ones. <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />