INSPEC08960

• Permit No: C1980001
• IBM Index Class Name: Inspection
• Doc Date: 4/12/1993
• Doc Name: Letter on Violations that Existed at Time of Inspection
• From: OSM
• To: DMG
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

III IIIIIIIIIIIII III
999
United States Department of the Interior
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING
Reclamation and Enforcement
Suite 1200
505 Marquette Avenue N.W.
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
April 9, 1993
~_
~~_
~ ~
IN REPLY REFER TO:
RECEIVED
APR 12 1993
DNS':;0 Ci ivllile;4a u ~:ou .;~Y
Permit: C-80-001
Mine Name: Edna Mine
Mr. Steve Renner, Coal Program Supervisor
Division of Minerals and Geology
Department of Natural Resources
215 Centennial Building
1313 Sherman Street
Denver, CO 80203
Dear Mr. Renner:
The enclosed Office o£ Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)
inspection report identifies violations that are considered to have
existed at the time of the last State complete inspection (LSCI) but had
not been cited.
Date of Federal Inspection: 4/2/93 Date of LSCI: 3/1/93
The determination that the State did not cite the violations is based on
one or more of the following reasons:
The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no
State enforcement action was taken.
X Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a
structure in existence as of the last State complete inspection
(sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.).
Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last
State complete inspection have not been established (diversion
ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers,
etc.).
X Site conditions indicate that the violation(s) noted had been in
existence at the time of, or prior to, the last State complete
inspection.
Other (give explanation).
Although the violations were cited by the State, or were abated during a
joint inspection, OSM believes that the violations were evident during
the last State complete inspection.
DMG NO V's c-93-023, C-93-025