Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 21 <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M- <br />INSPECTION DATE /02 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division as part of its monitoring of Construction Materials 110 permits. The operator <br />was contacted by fax about the inspection, but was not present at the time of the inspection. <br />The required permit ID sign was posted at the gated entrance near the NE corner of the permit area. The area is <br />rectangular, and the SE, SW and NW corners appeared to be marked by steel T-posts. The NE corner marker was not <br />observed, though it may have been on or near the highway ROW fenceline. No mining activity was near the NE corner. <br />The site consists of 9.9 acres, and appears to conform to conditions reported in the submitted annual reports. The pit is <br />still limited to the eastern half, with topsoil stockpiling on the west, and processing appearing to have been carried out in <br />the NW (though processing equipment has been removedl. There is a scale and scalehouse to the NE of the pit. Pit <br />entrance ramp is in the SW corner. <br />Significant amount of fines have been placed against the east and south walls of the pit, as part of the reclamation <br />backfilling and sloping. This is still in progress. There is a small erosional feature on the south face due to upland runoff <br />entering the pit and gullying the unarmored slope. Sediment and water are contained in the pit, and the reclamation of the <br />slope is not yet in the final stages, so the gullying is not considered a problem in this report. Better upland drainage control <br />and/or riprapping that part of the slope must be implemented, however, to prevent this from becoming worse. It is not in <br />conformance with the final reclamation. <br />The NW part of the permit, as mentioned above, was where processing (crushing and stockpiling) has occurred in the past. <br />There is still a veneer of crushed gravel covering about half an acre in this location. (The gravel has an appearance strongly <br />reminiscent of the "blue granite" mined at both the Dickerson and Aberdeen pits.) The road passing through the permit <br />area from the NE to the SW also exhibits a soil surface. The area affected by the road, processing equipment and <br />stockpiling of product still contains its topsoil, which was not stripped prior to carrying out these activities. Reclamation <br />of these areas, at the very least, requires that the Crushed gravel be removed from areas where present, the soil surface <br />ripped, then tilled and revegetated. <br />If you wish to have processing and stockpiling activities in this location in the future, the gravel must first be removed, and <br />the topsoil stripped also. Topsoil must be carefully salvaged and protected for future reclamation. Operating on areas <br />where topsoil has not been stripped is not in conformance with the Rule 3 reclamation standards. Stripped topsoil must <br />be placed on areas being reclaimed or stockpiled in a protected manner. This is not regarded as a problem in this report, <br />but if future inspections or annual reports show that additional activity occurred on these areas, and no topsoil salvage was <br />carried out prior, then there could be a problem to be corrected. <br />There is a problem noted under the topic of "offsite damage" on gage one which concerns the large affected area <br />immediately south of the permit area. This offsite area has been made bare from regular use, contains piles of various <br />materials (including fines and highway salt-sandl, parts and debris, and both dilapidated and operable equipment. The size <br />of the area is estimated to be about 4 acres. There has been no excavation in that area. Given the types of equipment <br />observed there, plus the various stockpiles and that the area is adjacent to the permitted area, it is not clear if this is simply <br />an extension of the permitted mining operation onto unpermitted land, or if it is activity and disturbance associated <br />exclusively with a separate construction business. Besides photos I took on 4/9/98 which show no such disturbance here, <br />the file contains no information about this area. The situation is confusing since the types of use here appear related to <br />the pit. The corrective action to this problem is that the operator must submit a brief statement of explanation regarding <br />activities in this adiacent unpermitted 4-acre area Items to include in the statement are: 111 whether the area is used <br />for stockpiling pitrun waste product or processed product from the pit 121 whether processing of material from the pit <br />occurs there• 131 whether the area has been or is planned to be excavated to provide materials for offsite sale or use; and <br />141 what ripes of uses the area receives and by whom This statement is to be received by this office by the date shown <br />on the last page (please see) Note• This 110 permit is for 9 9 acres and no more If the operator's use of this 4-acre <br />area is for activities which are involved in the operation of the 9 9-acre permitted area this item may become a possible <br />violation and the operator may be subject to enforcement action by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br />There were no additional items observed. See the last page concerning the corrective action for the problem. All responses <br />or questions about this inspection report should be directed to'thisinspector at the Division's Durango Field Office. The <br />address is: Division of Minerals and Geology, 701 Camino del Rio, Room 125, Durango, Colorado 81301; telephone <br />970/247-5193, or fax 970/247-5104. <br />