My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC07386
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC07386
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:04:47 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:31:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
9/16/1999
Doc Name
COAL INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
9/15/1999
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br />Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made during the <br />inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection and the facts or <br />evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br />This partial inspection of the Carbon Junction Coal Mine was conducted by DMG staff <br />from the Durango Office, 484 Turner Drive, Building F, Suite 101, Durango, CO 81301, <br />phone (970) 247-5469. On 9/30/99, the DMG Durango Office will be relocated to 701 <br />Camino Del Rio, Room 125, Durango, CO 81301. The phone number should remain the <br />same. Bob Pautasky was present during the initial portion of the inspection but soon <br />departed. Reclamation activities appeared to have recently ceased. <br />Vegetative cover for the portions of the rock fill area which had been recently <br />topsoiled, was well established and included, but not limited to, Yellow sweet clover, <br />Sunflower, Aster, Downy brome, Russian thistle, Kosha, Halogeton, Prickly lettuce, <br />Wooly mullen, Musk thistle and Scotch thistle. Evidence of seeding of reclamation <br />species was not observed. The operator is strongly encouraged to not allow the fall <br />seeding opportunity to pass without ensuring application of the appropriate reclamation <br />seed mix. <br />Sediment Pond 1, located at the far south end of the permit area, was dry. Primary <br />spillway was clear and stable, no discharge noted. Secondary spillway was well <br />vegetated and stable, no evidence of discharge. Pond embankment, inslopes and inlets <br />appeared well vegetated and stable. <br />Sediment Pond 2, located along the west side of the permit area, was holding water, <br />approximately 1' deep. Primary spillway was clear and functional, no discharge noted. <br />Secondary spillway appeared stable, no evidence of discharge. Pond embankment was <br />well vegetated and stable. <br />Evidence of erosion and sedimentation was observed within the sediment containment <br />ditch and pond inlet for Pond 2. Rock check dams in the sediment containment ditch <br />were intact. However, mild slope segments of the ditch have accumulated significant <br />sediment loads and steep slope segments of the ditch exhibited evidence of headcut <br />erosion which threaten to bypass the rock check dams. Sediment clean out and ditch <br />maintenance is r 'r to ensure that the sediment containment ditch continue to <br />function as designed. Failure to stabilize affected areas and control erosion may result <br />in enforcement action. <br />Fuel storage tanks, located within the Mutual Use Area (MUAI, appeared intact, no <br />evidence of rupture or escaped fuels. Spill containment berms were intact for the fuel <br />storage tanks. However, containment berms for the stockpiled waste asphalt, also <br />located within the MUA, were not evident. Apparently, the quantity of stockpiled <br />waste asphalt has exceeded the area previously defined by containment berms. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.