My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC07093
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC07093
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:04:11 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:29:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980251
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/13/2006
Doc Name
Unresolved Problems
From
DMG kap
To
Park County Road and Bridge
Inspection Date
9/15/2005
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 3) <br />MINE ID r OR PROSPECTING ID #: nn_r9an-ma <br />INSPECTION DATE: 9.u.yns <br />INSPECTOR~5INITIALS: _KE!' <br />The following problems (PB) and/or possible violations (PV) (and suggested corective actions) were identified <br />during this inspection. The problems should be corrected by the dates given, or they will become possible <br />violations. The possible violations should be corrected by the dotes given to reduce their severity when considered <br />by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. The inspector noted on the previous page should be notified of all <br />corrective actions taken. <br />PROBLEMS/POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS <br />AND <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS <br />CORRECTION <br />DATE <br />1' 11/ 15/05 <br />During the inspection, it was discovered that there were no boundary markers identifying <br />the permit boundary at the site. The is o problem related to Section 3.1.12 f21 of the <br />Construction Materials Rules and Regulations for failure to mark the boundaries of the <br />affected area by monuments or other markers that are clearly visible and adequate to <br />delineate such boundaries. <br />PB or PV: ~B_ <br />TOPICS}: _$M <br />:'orrentive Aniinn: Plnce np~priatP bar rndary markPrc at 1hP cite within 30 days of rerPiat - - - <br />nf'his insnartinn rP nri nnrf canrl nhatns to The Division fnr varifirntinn <br />2. 12/ 15/ OS <br />Durina the inspection it could not be determined whether any of the stockpiled material <br />is topsoil reserved for reclamation. Additionally, if any of the stockpiles are intended as <br />reclamction topsoil, none of The stockpiles possessed a protective veaefative cover. This is <br />a problem related to Rule 3.1.9 (1) of the Construction Materials Rules and Regulations, for <br />failure to remove and sP r~egatP topsoil from other spoil or of Rule Section 3 1 9 (1 I of the <br />Construction Materials Rules and Regulations for failure to employ veaefative cover or <br />other means to protPOt topsoil from erosion ke .p it ffP.P. of any contominafinn by toxic or <br />acid-forming material, and maintain it in a useable condition for reclamation. <br />PB or PV: ?fl_ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.