My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC06485
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC06485
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:02:41 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 8:26:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
INSPECTION REPORT
Inspection Date
3/16/1999
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
full growing season for revegetation at these two ponds. The embankment length of the <br />newest pond. Middle Flume #3.was checked by pacing: the length was roughly 224 feet. The <br />embankment inslope was estimated to be 13.5 feet high. <br />Springs - The fallowing field parameters were measured at springs. <br />Spring Flor.estim Temp..degrees C Ec. mmhos pH <br /> ated <br />Fox Den 5 gpm 10 1450 <br />East Pyeatt 0.29 in 2" 7 1800 7.7 <br /> flume <br />No Name 10 gpm 8 2300 <br />East 5 8 1400 <br />Cottonwood <br />Fax Den Spring was found to discharge from an outcrop of travertine that previously has not <br />been reported. The travertine deposit covers the ground a few tens of feet outward from <br />the spring. The travertine is thinly bedded.milky white, calcium carbonate with an orange <br />(iron oxide?)stain. The travertine may indicate that Fox Den Spring, at least in the past, <br />has had a deeper source than the thin-bedded sandstone unit that also outcrops at this <br />location. The travertine appears to be intercalated with the sandstone. The sandstone i5 <br />wihin the stratigraphic sequence being mined by Trapper a short distance uphill. The <br />source of Fox Den Spring is being considered in the update of Trapper's PHC. now in review. <br />Ground Water Monitoring Wells - The following wells had caps in place, were well-marked, <br />and surface casing was in good condition: GB 1, 2, and 5: GF-5. p-5, GD-3.: GC-1 and GC-2. <br />BACKFILL MID GRADING <br />No problems were found in the ash dump area. <br />EXPLOSIVES AND SUPPORT FACILITIES <br />No problems were found in the explosives storage magazine. The hazardous waste storage <br />area was in good order except for 4 full barrels that were outside the containment fence <br />and a grease barrel inside the fence that did not have a lid on it. The operator's <br />representative said the 4 barrels would be moved inside the fence and a lid will be put on <br />the open barrelright away. <br />GENERAL MINE PLAN COMPLIANCE <br />Draglines were operating at the south end of D-pit. in F-pit. and in A-South pit. A-East <br />pit remains open as the dragline in A-South pit will alernate between the two pits. There <br />were no more than two spoil ridges at each active pit. The areas stripped ahead of the <br />pits appears to comply with Trapper's approved operation plan. <br />AIR RESOURCE PROTECTION <br />On the first day of the inspection haul roads were drying out and wind started to blow dust <br />from North A-haul road, but Trappper's water truck came along and stopped the dust. At the <br />beginning of the second day of the inspection, Trapper was watering haul roads early in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.